Suppr超能文献

没有什么可失去的:对潜在损失的漠视驱使着寻求刺激和冒险的人。

Nothing to lose: processing blindness to potential losses drives thrill and adventure seekers.

机构信息

Insitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2850-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.048. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

Abstract

Sensation seeking has been linked to increased risk taking and is therefore crucial in influencing behavioral outcomes of risk-taking behavior. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the neural underpinnings of risk appraisal were studied in a large subject sample (n=188), stratified according to thrill and adventure seeking (TAS) ratings. As defined by a median split of the sample, low and high TAS groups were compared on a simple decision-making task completed during fMRI. The task was designed such that risk (i.e., magnitude of outcome) and gains (i.e., direction of outcome) could be mapped independently. Behavioral analysis indicated that high TAS individuals are more sensitive to rewards but less discriminating between risk with and without punishment and that low TAS individuals are less sensitive to rewards but quite sensitive to receiving punishments in risky situations. Imaging results on the group differences for the interaction between level of risk and level of gain showed differences in the right superior frontal gyrus (BA6), left insula (BA21), right nucleus accumbens, left lentiform nucleus, and left precuneus (BA7). The presented data suggest a neural model of risk processing in sensation seeking individuals such that the positive response to reward outweighs the impact of equivalent loss. This imbalance in approach/avoidance is evident in differences in the underlying neural substrates in TAS individuals and leads to greater risk behavior in the face of potential loss.

摘要

感觉寻求与冒险行为的增加风险承担有关,因此在影响冒险行为的行为结果方面至关重要。使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI),在一个大的受试者样本(n=188)中研究了风险评估的神经基础,这些受试者根据刺激和冒险寻求(TAS)评分进行分层。根据样本的中位数分割,低 TAS 和高 TAS 组在 fMRI 期间完成的简单决策任务中进行了比较。该任务的设计使得风险(即结果的幅度)和收益(即结果的方向)可以独立映射。行为分析表明,高 TAS 个体对奖励更敏感,但对有惩罚和无惩罚的风险之间的区别不敏感,而低 TAS 个体对奖励不敏感,但对在风险情况下受到惩罚非常敏感。对于风险水平和收益水平之间的交互作用的组间差异的成像结果显示,右侧额上回(BA6)、左侧脑岛(BA21)、右侧伏隔核、左侧豆状核和左侧楔前叶(BA7)存在差异。所呈现的数据表明,感觉寻求个体的风险处理的神经模型,即对奖励的积极反应超过了等效损失的影响。这种在接近/回避方面的不平衡在 TAS 个体的潜在神经基质差异中显而易见,并导致在面临潜在损失时表现出更大的风险行为。

相似文献

9
Neural substrates of approach-avoidance conflict decision-making.趋近-回避冲突决策的神经基础。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Feb;36(2):449-62. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22639. Epub 2014 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

9
Quantifying Behavioral Sensation Seeking With the Aroma Choice Task.通过香气选择任务量化行为感觉寻求
Assessment. 2020 Jul;27(5):873-886. doi: 10.1177/1073191119864659. Epub 2019 Jul 27.

本文引用的文献

3
Motivation and cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex.人类前额叶皮层中的动机与认知控制
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jul;12(7):939-45. doi: 10.1038/nn.2321. Epub 2009 Jun 7.
4
Neural correlates of emotional reactivity in sensation seeking.感觉寻求中情绪反应的神经关联
Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb;20(2):215-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02283.x.
7
The role of the pre-supplementary motor area in the control of action.辅助运动前区在动作控制中的作用。
Neuroimage. 2007;36 Suppl 2(3-3):T155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.034. Epub 2007 Mar 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验