• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同晶状体细胞人群入射现实人体眼球模型的单能电子剂量转换系数。

Dose conversion coefficients for monoenergetic electrons incident on a realistic human eye model with different lens cell populations.

机构信息

Technological and Nuclear Institute, Estrada Nacional No 10, 2686-953 Sacavém, Portugal.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2011 Nov 7;56(21):6919-34. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/21/010. Epub 2011 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/56/21/010
PMID:21983644
Abstract

The radiation-induced posterior subcapsular cataract has long been generally accepted to be a deterministic effect that does not occur at doses below a threshold of at least 2 Gy. Recent epidemiological studies indicate that the threshold for cataract induction may be much lower or that there may be no threshold at all. A thorough study of this subject requires more accurate dose estimates for the eye lens than those available in ICRP Publication 74. Eye lens absorbed dose per unit fluence conversion coefficients for electron irradiation were calculated using a geometrical model of the eye that takes into account different cell populations of the lens epithelium, together with the MCNPX Monte Carlo radiation transport code package. For the cell population most sensitive to ionizing radiation-the germinative cells-absorbed dose per unit fluence conversion coefficients were determined that are up to a factor of 4.8 higher than the mean eye lens absorbed dose conversion coefficients for electron energies below 2 MeV. Comparison of the results with previously published values for a slightly different eye model showed generally good agreement for all electron energies. Finally, the influence of individual anatomical variability was quantified by positioning the lens at various depths below the cornea. A depth difference of 2 mm between the shallowest and the deepest location of the germinative zone can lead to a difference between the resulting absorbed doses of up to nearly a factor of 5000 for electron energy of 0.7 MeV.

摘要

辐射诱导的后囊下白内障长期以来被普遍认为是一种确定性效应,在至少 2 Gy 的剂量以下不会发生。最近的流行病学研究表明,白内障诱发的阈值可能低得多,或者根本没有阈值。要彻底研究这个问题,就需要比 ICRP 出版物 74 中提供的更准确的晶状体剂量估计。使用考虑到晶状体上皮不同细胞群体的眼睛几何模型,并结合 MCNPX 蒙特卡罗辐射传输代码包,计算了电子辐照时单位注量的晶状体吸收剂量转换系数。对于对电离辐射最敏感的细胞群体——生殖细胞——确定了单位注量的吸收剂量转换系数,对于低于 2 MeV 的电子能量,其值比平均晶状体吸收剂量转换系数高 4.8 倍。将结果与之前发表的略有不同的眼睛模型的值进行比较,对于所有电子能量,结果通常都非常吻合。最后,通过将晶状体放置在角膜下方的不同深度来量化个体解剖结构变化的影响。在生殖层的最浅和最深位置之间存在 2 毫米的深度差异,对于 0.7 MeV 的电子能量,会导致吸收剂量的差异高达近 5000 倍。

相似文献

1
Dose conversion coefficients for monoenergetic electrons incident on a realistic human eye model with different lens cell populations.不同晶状体细胞人群入射现实人体眼球模型的单能电子剂量转换系数。
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Nov 7;56(21):6919-34. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/21/010. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
2
Dose conversion coefficients for electron exposure of the human eye lens.人眼晶状体电子照射的剂量转换系数。
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Jul 7;54(13):4069-87. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/13/008. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
3
Dose conversion coefficients for photon exposure of the human eye lens.人体眼睛晶状体的光子照射量换算系数。
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jan 21;56(2):415-37. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/2/009. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
4
Dose conversion coefficients for neutron exposure to the lens of the human eye.人眼晶状体受中子照射的剂量转换系数。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 Mar;148(4):507-13. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr202. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
5
Dose conversion coefficients for electron exposure of the human eye lens: calculations including a whole body phantom.人眼晶状体电子照射的剂量转换系数:包括全身模型的计算
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013 Jul;155(2):224-35. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncs325. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
6
Monitoring the eye lens: which dose quantity is adequate?监测眼晶状体:哪种剂量合适?
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Jul 21;55(14):4047-62. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/14/007. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
7
Fluence to effective dose conversion coefficients calculated for monoenergetic electrons up to 200 MeV in partial exposure geometries.针对部分照射几何条件下能量高达200 MeV的单能电子计算的注量到有效剂量转换系数。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004;112(3):345-58. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch412. Epub 2004 Oct 19.
8
Personal dose equivalent conversion coefficients for photons to 1 GeV.光子至1吉电子伏特的个人剂量当量转换系数。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011 Apr;145(1):28-35. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq380. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
9
Extended conversion coefficients for use in radiation protection of the embryo and fetus against external neutrons from 10 MeV to 100 GeV.用于胚胎和胎儿辐射防护以抵御能量从10兆电子伏至100吉电子伏的外部中子的扩展转换系数。
Health Phys. 2006 Mar;90(3):223-31. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000180776.45686.3b.
10
Monte Carlo determination of the conversion coefficients Hp(3)/Ka in a right cylinder phantom with 'PENELOPE' code. Comparison with 'MCNP' simulations.使用“PENELOPE”代码通过蒙特卡罗方法确定右圆柱体模中转换系数Hp(3)/Ka。与“MCNP”模拟结果的比较。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011 Mar;144(1-4):37-42. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq359. Epub 2011 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Relative biological effectiveness of 31 meV thermal neutrons in peripheral blood lymphocytes.31兆电子伏特热中子在外周血淋巴细胞中的相对生物效能
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2025 Mar 21;201(4):297-313. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncae231.
2
Numerical and clinical analysis of an eyeball injuries under direct impact.眼球直接冲击伤的数值和临床分析。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2023 May 23;36(2):263-273. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01913. Epub 2023 May 18.
3
Dynamic Pressure Measurements During Vitrectomy in a Model of the Eye.玻璃体切割术中模型眼的动态眼压测量。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 May 2;11(5):21. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.5.21.
4
Dosimetric comparison between realistic ocular model and other models for COMS plaque brachytherapy with Pd, Cs, and I radioisotopes.用于钯、铯和碘放射性同位素的COMS敷贴器近距离放射治疗的逼真眼部模型与其他模型之间的剂量学比较。
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2018 Aug;57(3):265-275. doi: 10.1007/s00411-018-0748-3. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
5
The effects of simulating a realistic eye model on the eye dose of an adult male undergoing head computed tomography.模拟逼真眼部模型对成年男性头部计算机断层扫描时眼部剂量的影响。
Radiat Environ Biophys. 2017 May;56(2):177-186. doi: 10.1007/s00411-017-0686-5. Epub 2017 Mar 10.