Biodynamics and Human Performance Center, Department of Health Sciences, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Savannah, Georgia, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Aug;26(8):2220-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318239f867.
Compared with lower extremity plyometrics, data concerning the loads and intensity associated with upper extremity plyometrics are limited. The purpose of this study was to compare vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) characteristics between the clap push-up and box drop push-ups from 3.8 cm (BD1), 7.6 cm (BD2), and 11.4 cm (BD3) heights and limbs (dominant, nondominant). Twenty-two healthy active male subjects (age 25.9 ± 1.3 years, height 1.8 ± 0.08 m, mass 87.6 ± 12 kg) performed 4 repetitions of each push-up variation in a random order. Four dependent variables, peak vGRF, time-to-peak vGRF, loading rate (LR), and propulsion rate (PR) were calculated for each extremity. Statistical analysis consisted of separate limb by variation repeated measures analysis of variance. In addition, ground contact time (GCT) was statistically compared between variations. The GCT for the clap push-up (p = 0.033) was significantly less than that for BD1 and BD2. No significant differences were revealed for time-to-peak vGRF (p = 0.717). Peak vGRF was significant between dominant and nondominant limbs (p = 0.045). Post hoc analysis of a significant limb by variation interaction in LR (p < 0.001) revealed the dominant limb to be significantly greater than the nondominant one in all 4 push-up variations. Furthermore, for both limbs, the clap LR was significantly greater than BD1, BD2, and BD3. The clap PR was significantly greater than BD1, BD2, and BD3. These data add rationale for determining upper extremity plyometric progression. The peak vGRFs are similar, and altering the box height did not affect peak vGRF. In contrast, the clap demonstrated the highest LR and PR suggesting that it may be a more powerful exercise than BD1, BD2, and BD3. The higher LR (Clap and BD3) for the dominant extremity illustrates bilateral disparity in the rate of eccentric loading.
与下肢增强式训练相比,有关上肢增强式训练的负荷和强度的数据有限。本研究的目的是比较从 3.8 厘米(BD1)、7.6 厘米(BD2)和 11.4 厘米(BD3)高度以及四肢(优势、非优势)进行拍手俯卧撑和箱式下落俯卧撑时的垂直地面反作用力(vGRF)特征。22 名健康活跃的男性受试者(年龄 25.9 ± 1.3 岁,身高 1.8 ± 0.08 m,体重 87.6 ± 12 kg)以随机顺序完成了每种俯卧撑变化 4 次重复。每个肢体计算了 4 个依赖变量,即峰值 vGRF、达到峰值 vGRF 的时间、加载率(LR)和推进率(PR)。统计分析包括单独的肢体通过变化重复测量方差分析。此外,还对变化之间的地面接触时间(GCT)进行了统计比较。拍手俯卧撑的 GCT(p = 0.033)明显小于 BD1 和 BD2。达到峰值 vGRF 的时间没有差异(p = 0.717)。峰值 vGRF 在优势和非优势肢体之间存在显著差异(p = 0.045)。LR 中显著的肢体与变化的相互作用的事后分析(p < 0.001)表明,在所有 4 种俯卧撑变化中,优势肢体明显大于非优势肢体。此外,对于两个肢体,拍手的 LR 明显大于 BD1、BD2 和 BD3。拍手的 PR 明显大于 BD1、BD2 和 BD3。这些数据为确定上肢增强式训练的进展提供了依据。峰值 vGRF 相似,改变盒子高度不会影响峰值 vGRF。相比之下,拍手表现出最高的 LR 和 PR,这表明它可能比 BD1、BD2 和 BD3 更具力量。优势肢体的较高 LR(拍手和 BD3)说明了偏心负载率的双侧差异。