Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 90095-1563, USA.
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Dec;25(6):993-9. doi: 10.1037/a0025903. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
Observational coding systems are uniquely suited for investigating interactional processes in couples and families, but their validity in diverse populations is unknown. We addressed this issue by applying factor analysis to interactional data collected from couples in low-income neighborhoods and coded with the widely used Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales (IFIRS). Our sample of 414 low-income, ethnically diverse newlywed couples each provided 24-min samples of problem-solving and social support behavior. Interrater reliabilities were strong, and the resultant factors--reflecting positive, negative, and effective communication--were very similar to those obtained with White middle-class samples. Additionally, couples were more negative, less positive, and less effective in problem-solving conversations than in socially supportive conversations, further supporting the validity of the IFIRS in this population. We conclude by discussing the strengths and shortcomings of the IFIRS when used in a low-income, ethnically diverse population.
观察性编码系统非常适合研究夫妻和家庭中的互动过程,但它们在不同人群中的有效性尚不清楚。我们通过对来自低收入社区的夫妻的互动数据进行因子分析来解决这个问题,这些数据是使用广泛使用的爱荷华家庭互动评分量表 (IFIRS) 编码的。我们的样本包括 414 对低收入、种族多样化的新婚夫妇,每对夫妇都提供了 24 分钟的解决问题和社会支持行为的样本。评分者间的信度很强,得到的反映积极、消极和有效沟通的因子与用白人中产阶级样本得到的因子非常相似。此外,与社会支持性对话相比,夫妻在解决问题的对话中更消极、更消极、更无效,这进一步支持了 IFIRS 在这一人群中的有效性。最后,我们讨论了在低收入、种族多样化的人群中使用 IFIRS 的优势和不足。