• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于脑死亡判定期间家属在场的全国多中心试验:FABRA 研究。

A national multicenter trial on family presence during brain death determination: the FABRA study.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, P. O. Box 2040, CA 3000 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2012 Oct;17(2):301-8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9636-2.

DOI:10.1007/s12028-011-9636-2
PMID:21989843
Abstract

PURPOSE

As brain death is a difficult concept for the lay public to understand, we hypothesized that allowing relatives of the patient to be present during brain death determination would improve their understanding of this condition and would eventually lead to an increased consent rate for organ donation.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter trial was conducted in five Dutch hospitals. Relatives were given the opportunity to be present during brain death testing. The family consent rate for organ donation was the primary endpoint examined, and the degree of the relatives' understanding of brain death was the secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

Between April 2010 and July 2011, we included the relatives of 8 patients in this study. The relatives witnessed brain death testing during this time. This sample size was too small to draw valid statistical conclusions. However, we have documented some noteworthy experiences of the relatives.

CONCLUSIONS

Although, the hypothesis behind this study had promise, we were unable to reach our predefined goal. The possible causes for this shortcoming included the rarity of patients with brain death, the common practice in the Netherlands of obtaining consent for organ donation before brain death testing and the uneasiness of the staff in the presence of the patients' relatives during brain death determination. Although, we cannot draw a conclusion from statistical evidence, we would recommend that relatives be given the opportunity to be present during brain death testing and, specifically, during the apnea test.

摘要

目的

由于脑死亡对于普通公众来说是一个难以理解的概念,我们假设允许患者的亲属在脑死亡判定期间在场,将提高他们对这种情况的理解,并最终导致器官捐献的同意率增加。

方法

在荷兰的五家医院进行了一项前瞻性多中心试验。亲属有机会在脑死亡测试期间在场。器官捐献的家庭同意率是主要的研究终点,亲属对脑死亡的理解程度是次要的研究终点。

结果

在 2010 年 4 月至 2011 年 7 月期间,我们纳入了 8 名患者的亲属参与本研究。在此期间,亲属见证了脑死亡测试。由于样本量太小,无法得出有效的统计结论。然而,我们记录了一些值得注意的亲属的经历。

结论

尽管该研究背后的假设很有前途,但我们未能达到预定的目标。造成这种缺陷的可能原因包括脑死亡患者的罕见性、荷兰在脑死亡测试前获得器官捐献同意的常见做法以及工作人员在脑死亡判定期间面对患者亲属时的不自在感。尽管我们无法从统计学证据中得出结论,但我们建议亲属有机会在脑死亡测试期间在场,特别是在呼吸暂停测试期间。

相似文献

1
A national multicenter trial on family presence during brain death determination: the FABRA study.一项关于脑死亡判定期间家属在场的全国多中心试验:FABRA 研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2012 Oct;17(2):301-8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9636-2.
2
Remarkable changes in the choice of timing to discuss organ donation with the relatives of a patient: a study in 228 organ donations in 20 years.患者亲属讨论器官捐赠时机选择方面的显著变化:20 年 228 例器官捐赠研究。
Crit Care. 2011;15(5):R235. doi: 10.1186/cc10481. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
3
Experiences of families when a relative is diagnosed brain stem dead: understanding of death, observation of brain stem death testing and attitudes to organ donation.亲属被诊断为脑死亡时家庭的经历:对死亡的理解、脑死亡检测的观察以及对器官捐赠的态度。
Anaesthesia. 2005 Oct;60(10):1002-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04297.x.
4
Requesting Relatives' Consent for Intensive Care for Organ Donation: An Empirical Analysis of Spanish Transplant Coordinators' Practices.请求亲属同意进行器官捐献的重症监护:对西班牙移植协调员实践的实证分析
Transplantation. 2025 May 1;109(5):e237-e247. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005210. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
5
Intensive care staff, the donation request and relatives' satisfaction with the decision: a focus group study.重症监护室工作人员、捐赠请求及亲属对该决定的满意度:一项焦点小组研究
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul 11;14:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-52. eCollection 2014.
6
An assessment of advance relatives approach for brain death organ donation.对脑死亡器官捐献中预先指定亲属方法的评估。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Mar;26(2):553-563. doi: 10.1177/0969733017708331. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
7
Physician Experiences with Communicating Organ Donation with the Relatives: A Dutch Nationwide Evaluation on Factors that Influence Consent Rates.医生在与亲属沟通器官捐献方面的经验:一项影响同意率因素的荷兰全国评估。
Neurocrit Care. 2019 Oct;31(2):357-364. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00678-8.
8
Bereaved relatives' decision about deceased organ donation: An integrated psycho-social study conducted in Spain.丧亲者对已故亲属器官捐献的决定:在西班牙进行的一项综合心理社会研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 May;205:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.039. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
9
Effect of "collaborative requesting" on consent rate for organ donation: randomised controlled trial (ACRE trial).“协作请求”对器官捐赠同意率的影响:随机对照试验(ACRE试验)
BMJ. 2009 Oct 8;339:b3911. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3911.
10
The HELLP concept - relatives of deceased donors need the Help Earlier in parallel with Loss of a Loved Person.HELLP理念——已故捐赠者的亲属在失去亲人的同时需要更早得到帮助。
Ann Transplant. 2012 Apr-Jun;17(2):18-28. doi: 10.12659/aot.883219.

引用本文的文献

1
Apnea Test: The Family in the Room.呼吸暂停测试:家属在场
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Aug;41(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01906-y. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
2
Death by Neurological Criteria: Caring for Families amid Tragedy.基于神经学标准判定的死亡:在悲剧中关怀家属。
Linacre Q. 2019 Nov;86(4):394-403. doi: 10.1177/0024363919874957. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
3
Controversies in defining and determining death in critical care.危重病患者定义和确定死亡方面的争议。

本文引用的文献

1
Remarkable changes in the choice of timing to discuss organ donation with the relatives of a patient: a study in 228 organ donations in 20 years.患者亲属讨论器官捐赠时机选择方面的显著变化:20 年 228 例器官捐赠研究。
Crit Care. 2011;15(5):R235. doi: 10.1186/cc10481. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
2
Emergency nursing resource: family presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation in the emergency department.急诊护理资源:急诊科侵入性操作及复苏过程中家属在场情况
J Emerg Nurs. 2011 Sep;37(5):469-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2011.04.012. Epub 2011 May 19.
3
Is organ donation from brain dead donors reaching an inescapable and desirable nadir?
Nat Rev Neurol. 2013 Mar;9(3):164-73. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.12. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
脑死亡供者器官捐献是否已达不可避免且理想的低谷?
Transplantation. 2011 Jun 15;91(11):1177-80. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182180567.
4
Donor conversion rates depend on the assessment tools used in the evaluation of potential organ donors.供者转化率取决于在潜在器官供者评估中使用的评估工具。
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Apr;37(4):665-70. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2131-6. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
5
Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: using evidence-based knowledge to guide the advanced practice nurse in developing formal policy and practice guidelines.心肺复苏期间家属在场:运用循证知识指导高级执业护士制定正式政策和实践指南。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2011 Jan;23(1):8-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00569.x. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
6
Part 3: ethics: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第三部分:伦理学:2010年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南。
Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S665-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970905.
7
The potential of legislation on organ donation to increase the supply of donor organs.立法促进器官捐献以增加供体器官的供应潜力。
Health Policy. 2010 Dec;98(2-3):164-70. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.019.
8
Organ donation performance in the Netherlands 2005-08; medical record review in 64 hospitals.2005-08 年荷兰器官捐献表现;64 家医院病历回顾。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Jun;25(6):1992-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp705. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
9
European nursing organizations stand up for family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a joint position statement.欧洲护理组织支持在心肺复苏期间家属在场:联合立场声明。
Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008 Summer;23(3):136-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7117.2008.00004.x.
10
Variability of brain death determination guidelines in leading US neurologic institutions.美国主要神经机构脑死亡判定指南的差异
Neurology. 2008 Jan 22;70(4):284-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000296278.59487.c2. Epub 2007 Dec 12.