• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康记录中问题、药物和实验室检查结果的分布:帕累托原则的应用

Distribution of Problems, Medications and Lab Results in Electronic Health Records: The Pareto Principle at Work.

作者信息

Wright Adam, Bates David W

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2010;1(1):32-37. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2009-12-RA-0023.

DOI:10.4338/ACI-2009-12-RA-0023
PMID:21991298
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3189502/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many natural phenomena demonstrate power-law distributions, where very common items predominate. Problems, medications and lab results represent some of the most important data elements in medicine, but their overall distribution has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to determine whether problems, medications and lab results demonstrate a power law distribution. METHODS: Retrospective review of electronic medical record data for 100,000 randomly selected patients seen at least twice in 2006 and 2007 at the Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston and its affiliated medical practices. RESULTS: All three data types exhibited a power law distribution. The 12.5% most frequently used problems account for 80% of all patient problems, the top 11.8% of medications account for 80% of all medication orders and the top 4.5% of lab result types account for all lab results. CONCLUSION: These three data elements exhibited power law distributions with a small number of common items representing a substantial proportion of all orders and observations, which has implications for electronic health record design.

摘要

背景

许多自然现象呈现幂律分布,其中极为常见的项目占主导地位。问题、药物和实验室检查结果是医学中一些最重要的数据元素,但其总体分布情况尚未见报道。目的:我们的目的是确定问题、药物和实验室检查结果是否呈现幂律分布。方法:回顾性分析2006年和2007年在波士顿布莱根妇女医院及其附属医疗机构至少就诊两次的100,000名随机选取患者的电子病历数据。结果:所有这三种数据类型均呈现幂律分布。最常出现的12.5%的问题占所有患者问题的80%,最常用的11.8%的药物占所有药物医嘱的80%,最常见的4.5%的实验室检查结果类型占所有实验室检查结果。结论:这三个数据元素呈现幂律分布,少数常见项目占所有医嘱和检查结果的很大比例,这对电子健康记录设计具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Distribution of Problems, Medications and Lab Results in Electronic Health Records: The Pareto Principle at Work.电子健康记录中问题、药物和实验室检查结果的分布:帕累托原则的应用
Appl Clin Inform. 2010;1(1):32-37. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2009-12-RA-0023.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Design of a cluster-randomized trial of electronic health record-based tools to address overweight and obesity in primary care.一项基于电子健康记录工具的整群随机试验设计,旨在解决初级保健中的超重和肥胖问题。
Clin Trials. 2015 Aug;12(4):374-83. doi: 10.1177/1740774515578132. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
5
Assessment of Patient Medication Adherence, Medical Record Accuracy, and Medication Blood Concentrations for Prescription and Over-the-Counter Medications.评估患者用药依从性、病历准确性以及处方药和非处方药的血药浓度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184196. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4196.
6
Mapping Power Law Distributions in Digital Health Social Networks: Methods, Interpretations, and Practical Implications.数字健康社交网络中的幂律分布映射:方法、解读及实际意义
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 25;17(6):e160. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4297.
7
Recognizing Alcohol and Drug Impairment in the Workplace in Florida识别佛罗里达州工作场所中的酒精和药物影响
8
Discontinuation of statins in routine care settings: a cohort study.常规护理环境中停止使用他汀类药物:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 2;158(7):526-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-7-201304020-00004.
9
Finite-size effects in transcript sequencing count distribution: its power-law correction necessarily precedes downstream normalization and comparative analysis.转录测序计数分布中的有限大小效应:幂律修正必然先于下游的标准化和比较分析。
Biol Direct. 2018 Feb 12;13(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13062-018-0204-y.
10
Agreement in Medications Reported in Medical and Dental Electronic Health Records.医学和牙科电子健康记录中报告的用药一致性
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2022 Apr;7(2):189-193. doi: 10.1177/23800844211004525. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Semantics in action: a guide for representing clinical data elements with SNOMED CT.实践中的语义学:使用SNOMED CT表示临床数据元素的指南。
J Biomed Semantics. 2025 Mar 27;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13326-025-00326-5.
2
Using a participatory approach to identify priorities to advance LHS implementation at an academic medical center.采用参与式方法确定优先事项,以推动学术医疗中心的初级卫生保健实施。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 May 26;9(1):e10431. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10431. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Clinical prognostic factors in surgically treated oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.手术治疗寡转移非小细胞肺癌的临床预后因素:一项系统评价
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Jul;10(7):3401-3408. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-1123.
4
Performance of HIV detection in Zhejiang province in China: The Pareto principle at work.中国浙江省的 HIV 检测表现:帕累托原则发挥了作用。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Jun;35(6):e23794. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23794. Epub 2021 May 4.
5
ClinicNet: machine learning for personalized clinical order set recommendations.ClinicNet:用于个性化临床医嘱集推荐的机器学习
JAMIA Open. 2020 Jun 28;3(2):216-224. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa021. eCollection 2020 Jul.
6
Two algorithms for the reorganisation of the problem list by organ system.两种按器官系统重新组织问题列表的算法。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Dec;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100024.
7
Neural Networks for Clinical Order Decision Support.用于临床医嘱决策支持的神经网络。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019 May 6;2019:315-324. eCollection 2019.
8
Patients' sense of responsibility to healthcare providers and its predictors: A national cross-sectional survey in China.患者对医疗保健提供者的责任感及其预测因素:中国的一项全国性横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 5;13(12):e0207361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207361. eCollection 2018.
9
Association model data learned from clinicians stratified by patient mortality outcomes at a Tertiary Academic Center.在一家三级学术中心,根据患者死亡率结果对临床医生进行分层后所学习到的关联模型数据。
Data Brief. 2018 Nov 2;21:1669-1673. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.10.163. eCollection 2018 Dec.
10
An evaluation of clinical order patterns machine-learned from clinician cohorts stratified by patient mortality outcomes.基于患者死亡率分层的临床医师队列中机器学习得出的临床医嘱模式评估。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Oct;86:109-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Expert consensus guidelines for stocking of antidotes in hospitals that provide emergency care.提供急诊护理的医院中解毒剂储备的专家共识指南。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Sep;54(3):386-394.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.01.023. Epub 2009 May 5.
2
Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians.门诊医疗中的电子健康记录——一项针对医生的全国性调查。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 3;359(1):50-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0802005. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
3
The state of regional health information organizations: current activities and financing.区域卫生信息组织的现状:当前活动与资金筹措
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jan-Feb;27(1):w60-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.w60. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
4
Automated development of order sets and corollary orders by data mining in an ambulatory computerized physician order entry system.在门诊计算机化医师医嘱录入系统中通过数据挖掘自动生成医嘱集和辅助医嘱。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:819-23.
5
Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records.医生与门诊电子健康记录。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct;24(5):1180-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1180.
6
Evaluation of a command-line parser-based order entry pathway for the Department of Veterans Affairs electronic patient record.对基于命令行解析器的退伍军人事务部电子病历医嘱录入途径的评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Sep-Oct;8(5):486-98. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080486.