Aebersold Paul
Global Regulatory Affairs, Quintiles, Inc., 1801 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Adv Prev Med. 2012;2012:507571. doi: 10.1155/2012/507571. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
The Food and Drug Administration issued a final rule in May 2002 to permit the Agency to approve drugs or license biological products on the basis of animal efficacy studies for use in ameliorating or preventing serious or life-threatening conditions caused by exposure to lethal or permanently disabling toxic biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear substances. Only two drugs were approved in the first nine years of the "Animal Rule" despite massive investment by the federal government since 2001 to stimulate development of medical countermeasures to biological threats. This article therefore examines the Food and Drug Administration reviews made public after approval of those two drugs and the public discussion at the Agency's Anti-Infective Drugs Advisory Committee of one biological product under development under the Animal Rule. Despite the paucity of approved drugs or licensed biological products as medical countermeasures, several investigational drugs have been placed in the National Strategic Stockpile for use as medical countermeasures, if needed.
美国食品药品监督管理局于2002年5月发布了一项最终规定,允许该机构根据动物有效性研究批准药物或许可生物制品,用于改善或预防因接触致死性或永久性致残性有毒生物、化学、放射性或核物质而导致的严重或危及生命的状况。尽管自2001年以来联邦政府投入了大量资金以刺激针对生物威胁的医疗对策的研发,但在“动物规则”实施的头九年里,仅批准了两种药物。因此,本文审视了这两种药物获批后美国食品药品监督管理局公开的审评情况,以及该机构抗感染药物咨询委员会对一种根据“动物规则”正在研发的生物制品的公开讨论。尽管作为医疗对策获批的药物或许可的生物制品数量稀少,但已有几种研究性药物被纳入国家战略储备,以备不时之需用作医疗对策。