Dept of Public Health and Policy, The Whelan Building, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The University of Liverpool, The Quadrangle, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Nov;73(10):1469-76. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.008. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
This article reflects on contributions from medical anthropology to our understanding of the bio-social and bio-political implications of renal transplantation. Taking up the idea of transplantation as a 'complex', a vast assemblage of people, places, practices and procedures which intersect medical, social and cultural domains, I point to a reliance in the anthropological literature on overly pre-determined conceptual frameworks, organised around a distinct polarisation between organ giving and receiving, where one side (supply) takes analytical, and indeed moral, precedence over the other (receipt). These frameworks tend to fail us when it comes to thinking about the wider social, cultural and political implications of transplant technologies. In an attempt to offer a less polarised view, I draw attention to the material and symbolic role of the immune system in transplantation and the ways in which it simultaneously shapes opportunities for procurement and the lived realities of recipiency. This helps us see the many complex ways in which suffering and inequality are constituted all along the variegated chains of supply and demand that are internal to, and made possible by, transplantation practices themselves.
这篇文章反思了医学人类学对我们理解肾移植的生物社会和生物政治影响的贡献。通过接受移植是一个“复杂”的概念,即一个由人和地点、实践和程序组成的巨大集合,它们交叉于医学、社会和文化领域,我指出,在人类学文献中,人们过于依赖预先确定的概念框架,这些框架围绕着器官捐献和接受之间的明显两极分化组织起来,其中一方(供应)在分析上,甚至在道德上,优先于另一方(接受)。当涉及到思考移植技术更广泛的社会、文化和政治影响时,这些框架往往会让我们失望。为了提供一个不那么两极分化的观点,我提请注意免疫系统在移植中的物质和象征作用,以及它如何同时塑造获取机会和接受者的生活现实。这有助于我们看到,在移植实践本身内部的供应和需求的多样化链条中,痛苦和不平等是如何以多种复杂的方式构成的。