College of Nursing, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Oct 12;11:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-72.
Women's access to vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the United States has declined steadily since the mid-1990s, with a current rate of 8.2%. In the State of Florida, less than 1% of women with a previous cesarean deliver vaginally. This downturn is thought to be largely related to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) VBAC guidelines, which mandate that a physician and anesthesiologist be "immediately available" during a trial of labor. The aim of this exploratory qualitative study was to explore the barriers associated with the ACOG VBAC guidelines, as well as the strategies that obstetricians and midwives use to minimize their legal risks when offering a trial of labor after cesarean.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 obstetricians, 12 midwives, and a hospital administrator (n = 24). Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis informed the findings.
Fear of liability was a central reason for obstetricians and midwives to avoid attending VBACs. Providers who continued to offer a trial of labor attempted to minimize their legal risks by being highly selective in choosing potential candidates. Definitions of "immediately available" varied widely among hospitals, and providers in solo or small practices often favored the convenience of a repeat cesarean delivery rather than having to remain in-house during a trial of labor. Midwives were often marginalized due to restrictive hospital policies and by their consulting physicians, even though women with previous cesareans were actively seeking their care.
The current ACOG VBAC guidelines limit US obstetricians' and midwives' ability to provide care for women with a previous cesarean, particularly in community and rural hospitals. Although ACOG has proposed that women be allowed to accept "higher levels of risk" in order to be able to attempt a trial of labor in some settings, access to VBAC is unlikely to increase in Florida as long as systemic barriers and liability risks remain high.
自 20 世纪 90 年代中期以来,美国女性进行剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)的比例稳步下降,目前为 8.2%。在佛罗里达州,只有不到 1%的前次剖宫产女性选择阴道分娩。这种下降趋势主要与美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)的 VBAC 指南有关,该指南规定,在试产期间,医生和麻醉师必须“随时可用”。本探索性定性研究旨在探讨与 ACOG VBAC 指南相关的障碍,以及产科医生和助产士在提供剖宫产后试产时为降低法律风险而采用的策略。
对 11 名产科医生、12 名助产士和 1 名医院管理人员(共 24 人)进行了半结构式访谈。访谈内容进行了录音和逐字记录,并通过主题分析得出研究结果。
避免承担法律责任是产科医生和助产士避免参与 VBAC 的主要原因。继续提供试产的提供者试图通过高度选择性地选择潜在候选人来降低法律风险。不同医院对“随时可用”的定义差异很大,而在单人或小型诊所工作的提供者通常更倾向于选择重复剖宫产的便利性,而不是在试产期间必须留在医院。由于医院政策的限制以及咨询医生的影响,助产士往往处于边缘地位,尽管有过剖宫产的女性积极寻求他们的护理。
目前的 ACOG VBAC 指南限制了美国产科医生和助产士为前次剖宫产女性提供护理的能力,尤其是在社区和农村医院。尽管 ACOG 提出,为了能够在某些情况下尝试试产,女性应该被允许接受“更高水平的风险”,但只要系统性障碍和法律责任风险仍然很高,佛罗里达州的 VBAC 就不太可能增加。