Division of Biostatistics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1540 Alcazar Street, CHP-220, Los Angeles, CA 90089-9011, USA.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2011 Jun;23(3):209-16. doi: 10.1007/BF03324962.
Low physical activity, one of five criteria in a validated clinical phenotype of frailty, is assessed by a standardized, semiquantitative questionnaire on up to 20 leisure time activities. Because of the time demanded to collect the interview data, it has been challenging to translate to studies other than the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), for which it was developed. Considering subsets of activities, we identified and evaluated streamlined surrogate assessment methods and compared them to one implemented in the Women's Health and Aging Study (WHAS).
Using data on men and women ages 65 and older from the CHS, we applied logistic regression models to rank activities by "relative influence" in predicting low physical activity.We considered subsets of the most influential activities as inputs to potential surrogate models (logistic regressions). We evaluated predictive accuracy and predictive validity using the area under receiver operating characteristic curves and assessed criterion validity using proportional hazards models relating frailty status (defined using the surrogate) to mortality.
Walking for exercise and moderately strenuous household chores were highly influential for both genders. Women required fewer activities than men for accurate classification. The WHAS model (8 CHS activities) was an effective surrogate, but a surrogate using 6 activities (walking, chores, gardening, general exercise, mowing and golfing) was also highly predictive.
We recommend a 6 activity questionnaire to assess physical activity for men and women. If efficiency is essential and the study involves only women, fewer activities can be included.
低体力活动是虚弱临床表型的五个标准之一,通过对多达 20 种休闲时间活动的标准化、半定量问卷进行评估。由于收集访谈数据所需的时间,将其翻译到除心血管健康研究(CHS)以外的研究中一直具有挑战性,该研究是为 CHS 开发的。考虑到活动的子集,我们确定并评估了简化的替代评估方法,并将其与在妇女健康与老龄化研究(WHAS)中实施的方法进行了比较。
使用来自 CHS 的 65 岁及以上男性和女性的数据,我们应用逻辑回归模型对预测低体力活动的活动进行“相对影响”排名。我们考虑了最有影响力的活动子集作为潜在替代模型(逻辑回归)的输入。我们使用接收器操作特征曲线下的面积来评估预测准确性和预测有效性,并使用与脆弱状态(使用替代物定义)与死亡率相关的比例风险模型评估标准有效性。
锻炼和适度剧烈的家务劳动对男女都有高度影响。女性比男性需要更少的活动来进行准确分类。WHAS 模型(8 项 CHS 活动)是一种有效的替代物,但使用 6 项活动(散步、家务、园艺、一般运动、割草和打高尔夫)的替代物也具有高度预测性。
我们建议使用 6 项活动问卷来评估男性和女性的体力活动。如果效率至关重要且研究仅涉及女性,则可以包含更少的活动。