• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ERAS 方案可减少腹腔镜结肠切除术的术后住院时间。

The ERAS protocol reduces the length of stay after laparoscopic colectomies.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Rivierenland Hospital Tiel, President Kennedylaan 1, 4002 WP, Tiel, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):361-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1877-9. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-011-1877-9
PMID:21993929
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol, which is developed to enhance postoperative recovery of patients treated with open colorectal surgery, has been widely adopted. The ERAS protocol has also been introduced in patients treated with laparoscopic colectomy, without data to support its additional value. We investigated whether laparoscopic colectomy in combination with the use of the ERAS protocol leads to a reduction of postoperative length of stay compared to laparoscopic colectomy with conventional care.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive medical record review. Inclusion criteria were patients who had undergone a laparoscopic colectomy at a single center between April 2004 and September 2009 (n = 186). The ERAS protocol had been introduced at the end of 2006. We divided the patients in a pre-ERAS group (n = 77), and an ERAS group (n = 109). We compared the baseline characteristics of both groups. The primary outcome was postoperative length of stay.

RESULTS

We did not find significant differences in gender, age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus (DM), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and diagnosis and type of surgery between the two groups. Median postoperative length of stay was 6 days (range = 2-28) in the pre-ERAS group and 4 days (range = 2-55) in the ERAS group (P = 0.007). Median return of bowel function was 3 days (range = 1-6) in the pre-ERAS group and 2 days (range = 1-5) in the ERAS group (P < 0.001). We did not find significant differences in postoperative procedure-related complications (wound infection, anastomotic leakage, abscesses), postoperative morbidity, 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, and 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative length of stay was significantly reduced in the ERAS group without differences in patient outcome. It is suggested that these results are the effect of a combination of the ERAS protocol with laparoscopic colectomy.

摘要

背景

加速康复外科(ERAS)方案旨在促进接受开腹结直肠手术的患者术后康复,目前已广泛应用。该方案也已引入腹腔镜结直肠切除术患者中,但缺乏其额外价值的数据支持。我们调查了腹腔镜结直肠切除术联合 ERAS 方案是否比常规护理下的腹腔镜结直肠切除术能减少术后住院时间。

方法

我们进行了全面的病历回顾。纳入标准为 2004 年 4 月至 2009 年 9 月期间在单中心接受腹腔镜结直肠切除术的患者(n=186)。ERAS 方案于 2006 年底推出。我们将患者分为 ERAS 前组(n=77)和 ERAS 组(n=109)。我们比较了两组的基线特征。主要结局是术后住院时间。

结果

两组在性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、糖尿病(DM)、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级以及诊断和手术类型方面无显著差异。ERAS 前组的中位术后住院时间为 6 天(范围=2-28),ERAS 组为 4 天(范围=2-55)(P=0.007)。ERAS 前组的中位肠道功能恢复时间为 3 天(范围=1-6),ERAS 组为 2 天(范围=1-5)(P<0.001)。两组术后与手术相关的并发症(伤口感染、吻合口漏、脓肿)、术后发病率、30 天再入院、30 天再次手术和 30 天死亡率无显著差异。

结论

ERAS 组的术后住院时间显著缩短,而患者结局无差异。提示这些结果是 ERAS 方案联合腹腔镜结直肠切除术的效果。

相似文献

1
The ERAS protocol reduces the length of stay after laparoscopic colectomies.ERAS 方案可减少腹腔镜结肠切除术的术后住院时间。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):361-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1877-9. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
2
Compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery criteria and preoperative and postoperative counselling reduces length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial.遵循术后加速康复标准以及进行术前和术后咨询可缩短结直肠手术的住院时间:一项随机对照试验的结果
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jun;18(6):603-11. doi: 10.1111/codi.13253.
3
Two-day hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery under an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway.腹腔镜结直肠手术后在加速康复外科(ERAS)路径下住院 2 天。
World J Surg. 2013 Oct;37(10):2483-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2155-x.
4
Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in laparoscopic colon surgery in the ERAS program.腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞与胸段硬膜外镇痛(TEA)在加速康复外科(ERAS)程序下腹腔镜结肠手术中的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):376-382. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5686-7. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
5
Is there a role for enhanced recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery? Preliminary results from a specialist obesity treatment center.腹腔镜减肥手术后强化康复是否有作用?来自一家专业肥胖治疗中心的初步结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jan;12(1):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
6
Laparoscopy is not enough: full ERAS compliance is the key to improvement of short-term outcomes after colectomy for cancer.腹腔镜检查还不够:完全遵循 ERAS 方案是改善结直肠癌手术后短期结局的关键。
Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):2067-2075. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06987-5. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
7
A retrospective study on efficacy of the ERAS protocol in patients undergoing surgery for Crohn disease: A propensity score analysis.回顾性研究加速康复外科(ERAS)方案在克罗恩病患者手术治疗中的疗效:倾向评分分析。
Dig Liver Dis. 2020 Jun;52(6):625-629. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
8
Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques.单切口腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:与标准腹腔镜和手助腹腔镜技术的病例对照比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jul;213(1):72-80; discussion 80-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.010. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
9
Laparoscopic-assisted and open high anterior resection within an ERAS protocol.加速康复外科(ERAS)方案下的腹腔镜辅助与开放高位前切除术。
World J Surg. 2012 May;36(5):1154-1161. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1519-y.
10
Lessons following implementation of a colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in a rural hospital setting.在农村医院环境中实施结直肠手术后加速康复(ERAS)方案后的经验教训。
ANZ J Surg. 2024 May;94(5):910-916. doi: 10.1111/ans.18838. Epub 2024 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Readmission and Adoption of Early Discharge After Colectomy Using ACS-NSQIP: Is It Time for Widespread Adoption?利用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)评估结肠切除术后再入院情况及早期出院的应用:现在是广泛应用的时候了吗?
J Surg Res. 2025 May;309:242-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.03.021. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
2
ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery is effective in octogenarians: A retrospective cohort study.结直肠癌手术中的加速康复外科(ERAS)方案对八旬老人有效:一项回顾性队列研究。
Surg Open Sci. 2025 Mar 13;24:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.03.004. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Cost saving in implementing ERAS protocol in emergency abdominal surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery.结直肠手术的快速康复外科与传统恢复策略对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16(2):CD007635. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007635.pub2.
2
Laparoscopic gastric surgery in an enhanced recovery programme.腹腔镜胃手术在加速康复方案中的应用。
Br J Surg. 2010 Oct;97(10):1547-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7184.
3
Advantages of fast-track recovery after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术后快速康复的优势。
实施急诊腹部手术快速康复(ERAS)方案的成本节约。
BMC Surg. 2024 Feb 22;24(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02345-y.
4
Accelerated enhanced recovery after colon cancer surgery with discharge within one day after surgery: a systematic review.加速结直肠癌手术后的快速康复,术后一天内出院:系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jan 18;24(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11803-4.
5
Accelerated 23-h enhanced recovery protocol for colon surgery: the CHASE-study.加速 23 小时强化康复方案用于结肠手术:CHASE 研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 1;12(1):20707. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25022-7.
6
Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project.老年直肠癌患者的多学科管理:来自 SICG(意大利老年外科学会)、SIFIPAC(意大利外科病理生理学学会)、SICE(意大利内镜外科学会和新技术学会)和 WSES(世界急诊外科学会)国际共识项目的建议。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Jul 2;16(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00378-9.
7
The role of procalcitonin in reducing antibiotics across the surgical pathway.降钙素原在减少外科通路抗生素使用中的作用。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Mar 24;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00357-0.
8
Role for colorectal teams to support non-colorectal teams to improve clinical outcomes and adherence to ERAS guidelines for segmental colectomy: a cohort study.结直肠团队在支持非结直肠团队以改善临床结局和遵守结直肠切除术加速康复外科指南方面的作用:一项队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2021 Mar 16;21(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01149-8.
9
Evolving trends in peri-operative management of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: working towards quicker recovery and day surgery pyeloplasty.小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻围手术期管理的发展趋势:朝着更快康复和日间手术肾盂成形术努力
World J Urol. 2021 Sep;39(9):3677-3684. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03621-9. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
10
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Outcomes in Patients with Prior Diagnosis of Diabetes.既往诊断为糖尿病患者的术后加速康复(ERAS)结局
J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. 2019;34(1):73-79. doi: 10.15605/jafes.034.01.11. Epub 2019 May 7.
Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1911-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0871-y. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
4
An enhanced-recovery protocol improves outcome after colorectal resection already during the first year: a single-center experience in 168 consecutive patients.强化康复方案在结直肠切除术后第一年即可改善预后:168例连续患者的单中心经验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 May;52(5):978-85. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819f1416.
5
Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结肠癌后的生存率:一项随机临床试验的长期结果
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
6
Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.评估腹腔镜结直肠手术的难度程度。
Arch Surg. 2008 Aug;143(8):762-7; discussion 768. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.8.762.
7
Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery.循证外科护理与快速康复外科的发展
Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):189-98. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a.
8
[Fast-track laparoscopic radical prostatectomy].[快速通道腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术]
Urologe A. 2008 Jun;47(6):712-7. doi: 10.1007/s00120-008-1688-3.
9
Anastomotic leakage after elective right versus left colectomy for cancer: prevalence and independent risk factors.择期右半结肠切除术与左半结肠切除术治疗癌症后吻合口漏的发生率及独立危险因素
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Dec;205(6):785-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.284. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
10
Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜辅助与开放性结肠癌切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;142(3):298-303. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.3.298.