• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

频率依赖性 NMDA 受体依赖性突触可塑性变化。

Frequency-Dependent Changes in NMDAR-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity.

机构信息

Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Comput Neurosci. 2011 Sep 29;5:38. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2011.00038. eCollection 2011.

DOI:10.3389/fncom.2011.00038
PMID:21994493
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3182344/
Abstract

The NMDAR-dependent synaptic plasticity is thought to mediate several forms of learning, and can be induced by spike trains containing a small number of spikes occurring with varying rates and timing, as well as with oscillations. We computed the influence of these variables on the plasticity induced at a single NMDAR containing synapse using a reduced model that was analytically tractable, and these findings were confirmed using detailed, multi-compartment model. In addition to explaining diverse experimental results about the rate and timing dependence of synaptic plasticity, the model made several novel and testable predictions. We found that there was a preferred frequency for inducing long-term potentiation (LTP) such that higher frequency stimuli induced lesser LTP, decreasing as 1/f when the number of spikes in the stimulus was kept fixed. Among other things, the preferred frequency for inducing LTP varied as a function of the distance of the synapse from the soma. In fact, same stimulation frequencies could induce LTP or long-term depression depending on the dendritic location of the synapse. Next, we found that rhythmic stimuli induced greater plasticity then irregular stimuli. Furthermore, brief bursts of spikes significantly expanded the timing dependence of plasticity. Finally, we found that in the ∼5-15-Hz frequency range both rate- and timing-dependent plasticity mechanisms work synergistically to render the synaptic plasticity most sensitive to spike timing. These findings provide computational evidence that oscillations can have a profound influence on the plasticity of an NMDAR-dependent synapse, and show a novel role for the dendritic morphology in this process.

摘要

NMDAR 依赖性突触可塑性被认为介导了几种形式的学习,并且可以通过具有不同速率和时间以及振荡的少量尖峰的尖峰序列来诱导。我们使用可分析处理的简化模型计算了这些变量对单个包含 NMDAR 的突触诱导的可塑性的影响,并且使用详细的多室模型确认了这些发现。除了解释关于突触可塑性的速率和时间依赖性的各种实验结果外,该模型还做出了一些新颖且可测试的预测。我们发现,存在诱导长时程增强(LTP)的最佳频率,使得较高频率的刺激诱导较少的 LTP,当刺激中的尖峰数量保持固定时,随着 1/f 而减少。除其他外,诱导 LTP 的最佳频率随突触与胞体的距离而变化。实际上,相同的刺激频率可以根据突触的树突位置诱导 LTP 或长时程抑制。接下来,我们发现,节律性刺激比不规则刺激诱导更大的可塑性。此外,短暂的尖峰爆发显着扩展了可塑性的时间依赖性。最后,我们发现,在约 5-15 Hz 的频率范围内,基于速率和基于时间的可塑性机制协同作用,使突触可塑性对尖峰时间最为敏感。这些发现为计算提供了证据,表明振荡可以对 NMDAR 依赖性突触的可塑性产生深远的影响,并显示出树突形态在该过程中的新作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/f848b91d4e23/fncom-05-00038-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/77bec63a373e/fncom-05-00038-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/ec887ca5c8e3/fncom-05-00038-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/dbc5ef06a168/fncom-05-00038-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/8e03a6938951/fncom-05-00038-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/a95a56983c10/fncom-05-00038-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/72dbb92dddaa/fncom-05-00038-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/cba2f5388fe7/fncom-05-00038-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/f848b91d4e23/fncom-05-00038-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/77bec63a373e/fncom-05-00038-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/ec887ca5c8e3/fncom-05-00038-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/dbc5ef06a168/fncom-05-00038-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/8e03a6938951/fncom-05-00038-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/a95a56983c10/fncom-05-00038-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/72dbb92dddaa/fncom-05-00038-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/cba2f5388fe7/fncom-05-00038-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff25/3182344/f848b91d4e23/fncom-05-00038-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Frequency-Dependent Changes in NMDAR-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity.频率依赖性 NMDA 受体依赖性突触可塑性变化。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2011 Sep 29;5:38. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2011.00038. eCollection 2011.
2
Hebbian Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity at the Cerebellar Input Stage.小脑输入阶段的赫布型峰电位时间依赖性可塑性。
J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 15;37(11):2809-2823. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2079-16.2016. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
3
Learning rules for spike timing-dependent plasticity depend on dendritic synapse location.依赖于峰电位时间的可塑性的学习规则取决于树突突触的位置。
J Neurosci. 2006 Oct 11;26(41):10420-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2650-06.2006.
4
Dendritic synapse location and neocortical spike-timing-dependent plasticity.树突状突触位置与新皮层尖峰时间依赖可塑性。
Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2010 Jul 21;2:29. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00029. eCollection 2010.
5
Requirement of dendritic calcium spikes for induction of spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity.树突状钙峰对于诱导尖峰时间依赖性突触可塑性的需求。
J Physiol. 2006 Jul 1;574(Pt 1):283-90. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.111062. Epub 2006 May 4.
6
Robustness of STDP to spike timing jitter.STDP 对尖峰时间抖动的鲁棒性。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 25;8(1):8139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26436-y.
7
Interplay of multiple pathways and activity-dependent rules in STDP.在 STDP 中多个途径和活动依赖性规则的相互作用。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Aug 14;14(8):e1006184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006184. eCollection 2018 Aug.
8
Associative spike timing-dependent potentiation of the basal dendritic excitatory synapses in the hippocampus in vivo.体内海马体基底树突兴奋性突触的联合峰电位时间依赖性增强。
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jun 1;115(6):3264-74. doi: 10.1152/jn.00188.2016. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
9
Endocannabinoids mediate bidirectional striatal spike-timing-dependent plasticity.内源性大麻素介导双向纹状体峰电位时间依赖性可塑性。
J Physiol. 2015 Jul 1;593(13):2833-49. doi: 10.1113/JP270324. Epub 2015 May 13.
10
Questions about STDP as a General Model of Synaptic Plasticity.关于 STDP 作为突触可塑性一般模型的问题。
Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2010 Oct 4;2:140. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00140. eCollection 2010.

引用本文的文献

1
Expansion of epileptogenic networks via neuroplasticity in neural mass models.神经团模型中通过神经可塑性实现致痫网络的扩展。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Dec 3;20(12):e1012666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012666. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Mild focal cooling selectively impacts computations in dendritic trees.轻度局部冷却选择性地影响树突状树突中的计算。
bioRxiv. 2024 Nov 3:2024.11.02.621672. doi: 10.1101/2024.11.02.621672.
3
A stochastic model of hippocampal synaptic plasticity with geometrical readout of enzyme dynamics.具有酶动力学几何读出功能的海马突触可塑性随机模型。

本文引用的文献

1
Speed controls the amplitude and timing of the hippocampal gamma rhythm.速度控制海马体γ节律的幅度和时间。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021408. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
2
Distance- and activity-dependent modulation of spike back-propagation in layer V pyramidal neurons of the medial entorhinal cortex.距离和活动依赖性调制内侧隔核 V 层锥体神经元中的尖峰逆行传播。
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Mar;105(3):1372-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.00014.2010. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
3
Mechanisms of induction and maintenance of spike-timing dependent plasticity in biophysical synapse models.
Elife. 2023 Aug 17;12:e80152. doi: 10.7554/eLife.80152.
4
Memory rescue and learning in synaptic impaired neuronal circuits.突触受损神经回路中的记忆拯救与学习
iScience. 2023 May 29;26(7):106931. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106931. eCollection 2023 Jul 21.
5
Spike-timing-dependent plasticity rewards synchrony rather than causality.尖峰时间依赖性可塑性奖励同步性而非因果关系。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Dec 15;33(1):23-34. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac050.
6
Linking hippocampal multiplexed tuning, Hebbian plasticity and navigation.连接海马体的多重调谐、赫布可塑性和导航。
Nature. 2021 Nov;599(7885):442-448. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03989-z. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
7
Optimal Stimulation Protocol in a Bistable Synaptic Consolidation Model.双稳态突触巩固模型中的最佳刺激方案
Front Comput Neurosci. 2019 Nov 13;13:78. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00078. eCollection 2019.
8
Intracellular calcium stores mediate metaplasticity at hippocampal dendritic spines.细胞内钙库介导海马树突棘的转换形易化。
J Physiol. 2019 Jul;597(13):3473-3502. doi: 10.1113/JP277726. Epub 2019 Jun 2.
9
From membrane receptors to protein synthesis and actin cytoskeleton: Mechanisms underlying long lasting forms of synaptic plasticity.从膜受体到蛋白质合成和肌动蛋白细胞骨架:长时程突触可塑性的基础机制。
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Nov;95:120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
10
Portraits of communication in neuronal networks.神经元网络中的交流特征。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019 Feb;20(2):117-127. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0094-0.
生物物理突触模型中尖峰时间依赖可塑性的诱导和维持机制。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2010 Sep 17;4. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2010.00136. eCollection 2010.
4
Spike timing dependent plasticity: a consequence of more fundamental learning rules.尖峰时间依赖可塑性:更基本学习规则的结果。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2010 Jul 1;4. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2010.00019. eCollection 2010.
5
Connectivity reflects coding: a model of voltage-based STDP with homeostasis.连接反映编码:具有内稳态的基于电压的 STDP 的模型。
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Mar;13(3):344-52. doi: 10.1038/nn.2479. Epub 2010 Jan 24.
6
Frequency of gamma oscillations routes flow of information in the hippocampus.伽马振荡的频率引导海马体中的信息流。
Nature. 2009 Nov 19;462(7271):353-7. doi: 10.1038/nature08573.
7
Short trains of theta frequency stimulation enhance CA1 pyramidal neuron excitability in the absence of synaptic potentiation.在缺乏突触增强的情况下,短串的θ频率刺激可增强CA1锥体神经元的兴奋性。
J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 9;29(36):11203-14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1450-09.2009.
8
Gain in sensitivity and loss in temporal contrast of STDP by dopaminergic modulation at hippocampal synapses.海马突触处多巴胺能调制对突触可塑性时间依赖性可塑性的敏感性增加和时间对比度降低。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):13028-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900546106. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
9
Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices.前额叶和顶叶后部皮质中注意力的自上而下与自下而上控制
Science. 2007 Mar 30;315(5820):1860-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1138071.
10
Limits on the memory storage capacity of bounded synapses.有限突触的记忆存储容量限制。
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Apr;10(4):485-93. doi: 10.1038/nn1859. Epub 2007 Mar 11.