Department of Emergency Medicine, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Oct;23(5):640-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01435.x. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
Debate around medical futility has produced a vast literature that continues to grow. Largely absent from the broader literature is the role of emergency medicine in either starting measures that prove to be futile, withholding treatment or starting the end of life communication process with patients and families. In this discussion we review the status of the futility debate in general, identify some of the perceived barriers in managing futile care in the ED including the ethical and legal issues, and establish the contribution of emergency medicine in this important debate. We conclude that emergency physicians have the clinical ability and the legal and moral standing to resist providing futile treatment. In these situations they can take a different path that focuses on comfort care thereby initiating the process of the much sought after 'good death'.
关于医疗无效性的争论产生了大量的文献,而且这一文献还在不断增加。在更广泛的文献中,基本上没有涉及急诊医学在启动被证明是无效的措施、拒绝治疗或与患者和家属开始生命终末期沟通过程中的作用。在本次讨论中,我们回顾了无效性争论的现状,确定了在急诊科管理无效护理时遇到的一些障碍,包括伦理和法律问题,并确定了急诊医学在这一重要争论中的贡献。我们得出的结论是,急诊医生具有临床能力以及法律和道德地位,可以拒绝提供无效治疗。在这些情况下,他们可以选择一条不同的道路,专注于舒适护理,从而启动人们一直渴望的“善终”过程。