Suppr超能文献

“无效治疗”——急诊医学视角:伦理与法律考量

"Futile Care"-An Emergency Medicine Approach: Ethical and Legal Considerations.

作者信息

Simon Jeremy R, Kraus Chadd, Rosenberg Mark, Wang David H, Clayborne Elizabeth P, Derse Arthur R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;70(5):707-713. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

Abstract

Futility often serves as a proposed reason for withholding or withdrawing medical treatment, even in the face of patient and family requests. Although there is substantial literature describing the meaning and use of futility, little of it is specific to emergency medicine. Furthermore, the literature does not provide a widely accepted definition of futility, and thus is difficult if not impossible to apply. Some argue that even a clear concept of futility would be inappropriate to use. This article will review the origins of and meanings suggested for futility, specific challenges such cases create in the emergency department (ED), and the relevant legal background. It will then propose an approach to cases of perceived futility that is applicable in the ED and does not rely on unilateral decisions to withhold treatment, but rather on avoiding and resolving the conflicts that lead to physicians' believing that patients are asking them to provide "futile" care.

摘要

即使面对患者及其家属的要求,医疗无效常常被当作停止或撤销治疗的一个理由。尽管有大量文献描述了医疗无效的含义及应用,但其中很少有专门针对急诊医学的。此外,文献并未给出一个被广泛接受的医疗无效定义,因此即便不是完全无法应用,也很难应用。一些人认为,即便有一个明确的医疗无效概念,使用起来也不合适。本文将回顾医疗无效的起源和所提出的含义、这类情况在急诊科造成的具体挑战以及相关法律背景。然后,本文将提出一种适用于急诊科中被视为医疗无效情况的处理方法,该方法不依赖于单方面停止治疗的决定,而是致力于避免和解决导致医生认为患者要求他们提供“无效”治疗的冲突。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验