Elmahjub Ezieddin
Associate Professor of Law, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Glob Bioeth. 2022 Dec 6;33(1):133-154. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2022.2118977. eCollection 2022.
This article addresses the bioethical challenges raised by end-of-life care (EoLC) from the perspective of Islamic normativity. Rejecting positivist positions, it argues for the use of a flexible approach midway between a deontological conception of human life as having a sacred value that cannot be bargained over, as represented by the teachings of Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī's, and one that introduces considerations of pain (alam) and pleasure (ladhdah) into ethical evaluations, as expounded by the jurist Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī. Under this approach, described as "Islamic evaluator relativity," moral agents formulate a normative position tailored to their beliefs and the circumstances of the case, in which the right course of action is expressed as a value judgement (amr ijtihādi) and the evaluator (mujtahid) is rewarded regardless of the choices they make. Keywords: Islamic bioethics, End-of-life-care, bioethics, normative ethics.
本文从伊斯兰规范性的角度探讨了临终关怀(EoLC)引发的生物伦理挑战。它拒绝实证主义立场,主张采用一种灵活的方法,该方法介于以阿布·哈米德·安萨里(Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī)的教义为代表的、将人类生命视为具有不可讨价还价的神圣价值的道义论概念,与法学家法赫尔丁·拉齐(Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī)所阐述的、将痛苦(alam)和愉悦(ladhdah)的考量引入伦理评估的概念之间。在这种被称为“伊斯兰评估者相对性”的方法下,道德主体根据他们的信仰和具体情况制定一种规范性立场,其中正确的行动方针被表达为一种价值判断(amr ijtihādi),并且评估者(mujtahid)无论做出何种选择都会得到回报。关键词:伊斯兰生物伦理学、临终关怀、生物伦理学、规范伦理学。