• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用氰基丙烯酸辛酯闭合撕裂伤和切口:一项多中心随机对照试验

Closure of lacerations and incisions with octylcyanoacrylate: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Singer Adam J, Quinn James V, Clark Robert E, Hollander Judd E

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY.

出版信息

Surgery. 2002 Mar;131(3):270-6. doi: 10.1067/msy.2002.121377.

DOI:10.1067/msy.2002.121377
PMID:11894031
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most lacerations and surgical incisions are closed with sutures or staples. Octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (OCA) was recently approved for use in the United States. We compared the cosmetic appearance of lacerations and incisions repaired with OCA versus standard wound closure methods (SWC).

METHODS

A multicenter randomized clinical trial including patients with simple lacerations or surgical incisions was conducted at 10 clinical sites. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with OCA or SWC. Follow-up was performed at 1 week and at 3 months to determine infection rates and cosmetic outcome.

RESULTS

Eight hundred fourteen patients with 924 wounds (383 traumatic lacerations, 235 excisions of skin lesions or scar revisions, 208 minimally invasive surgeries, and 98 general surgical procedures) were enrolled. Groups were similar in baseline characteristics. Wound closure with OCA was faster than with SWC (2.9 vs 5.2 minutes, P <.001). At 1 week infection rates were similar (OCA, 2.1% vs SWC, 0.7%; P =.09) and fewer OCA wounds were erythematous (18% vs 36%, P <.001). There were no differences in wound dehiscence rates (OCA, 1.6% vs SWC, 0.9%; P =.35). At 3 months there was no difference in the percent of wounds with optimal appearance (OCA, 82% vs SWC, 83%; P =.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Repair of traumatic lacerations and surgical incisions with OCA is faster than with SWC, and cosmetic outcome is similar at 3 months.

摘要

背景

大多数撕裂伤和手术切口通过缝合或钉合进行闭合。氰基丙烯酸辛酯组织粘合剂(OCA)最近在美国被批准使用。我们比较了用OCA修复的撕裂伤和切口与标准伤口闭合方法(SWC)的美容效果。

方法

在10个临床地点进行了一项多中心随机临床试验,纳入了患有单纯撕裂伤或手术切口的患者。患者被随机分配接受OCA或SWC治疗。在1周和3个月时进行随访,以确定感染率和美容效果。

结果

纳入了814例患者的924处伤口(383处外伤性撕裂伤、235处皮肤病变切除或瘢痕修复、208例微创手术和98例普通外科手术)。两组在基线特征方面相似。用OCA进行伤口闭合比SWC更快(2.9分钟对5.2分钟,P<.001)。在1周时,感染率相似(OCA为2.1%,SWC为0.7%;P=.09),且OCA伤口出现红斑的较少(18%对36%,P<.001)。伤口裂开率没有差异(OCA为1.6%,SWC为0.9%;P=.35)。在3个月时,外观最佳的伤口百分比没有差异(OCA为82%,SWC为83%;P=.67)。

结论

用OCA修复外伤性撕裂伤和手术切口比SWC更快,且3个月时的美容效果相似。

相似文献

1
Closure of lacerations and incisions with octylcyanoacrylate: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.用氰基丙烯酸辛酯闭合撕裂伤和切口:一项多中心随机对照试验
Surgery. 2002 Mar;131(3):270-6. doi: 10.1067/msy.2002.121377.
2
Tissue adhesives for simple traumatic lacerations.用于简单外伤性撕裂伤的组织粘合剂。
J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):222-4. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.222.
3
Prospective randomized trial of skin adhesive versus sutures for closure of 217 laparoscopic port-site incisions.皮肤粘合剂与缝线用于闭合217个腹腔镜手术切口的前瞻性随机试验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Jun;196(6):845-53. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(03)00119-4.
4
Evaluation of a novel wound closure device: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.新型伤口闭合装置的评估:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;18(10):1060-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01177.x.
5
A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of tissue adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) versus standard wound closure in breast surgery.一项关于组织粘合剂(2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯)与标准伤口缝合在乳腺手术中应用的前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验。
Surgery. 2004 Sep;136(3):593-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.02.015.
6
Determinants of poor outcome after laceration and surgical incision repair.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Aug;110(2):429-35; discussion 436-7. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200208000-00008.
7
Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of tissue adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) vs standard wound closure techniques for laceration repair. Stony Brook Octylcyanoacrylate Study Group.组织粘合剂(2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯)与标准伤口闭合技术用于撕裂伤修复的前瞻性、随机、对照试验。石溪氰基丙烯酸辛酯研究组。
Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;5(2):94-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02590.x.
8
A randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term cosmetic outcomes of traumatic pediatric lacerations repaired with absorbable plain gut versus nonabsorbable nylon sutures.一项随机对照试验,比较用可吸收的普通肠线与不可吸收的尼龙缝线修复小儿外伤性撕裂伤的长期美容效果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jul;11(7):730-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.029.
9
Comparing cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and conventional subcuticular skin sutures for maxillofacial incisions--a prospective randomized trial considering closure time, wound morbidity, and cosmetic outcome.比较氰基丙烯酸酯组织粘合剂与传统皮下皮肤缝线用于颌面切口——一项考虑闭合时间、伤口发病率和美容效果的前瞻性随机试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;71(12):2152.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.029.
10
A randomised clinical trial to compare octyl cyanoacrylate with absorbable monofilament sutures for the closure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy port incisions.一项比较辛基氰基丙烯酸酯和可吸收单丝缝线用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术切口闭合的随机临床试验。
Int Wound J. 2020 Apr;17(2):449-454. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13294. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Attached Oral Mucosal Wound Closure using Blue Glue - A Prospective Clinical Study.使用蓝色胶水进行口腔黏膜伤口闭合——一项前瞻性临床研究。
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jan-Jun;13(1):31-36. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_2_23. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
2
Evaluation of microMend wound closure device in repairing skin lacerations.评价 microMend 伤口闭合装置在修复皮肤裂伤中的应用。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Aug;40(8):564-568. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212667. Epub 2023 May 23.
3
Comparison of Tissue Adhesive Glue with Subcuticular Absorbable Suture for Skin Closure Following Thyroid Surgery: A single-blinded randomised controlled trial.
组织粘合剂胶水与皮下可吸收缝线在甲状腺手术后皮肤缝合中的比较:一项单盲随机对照试验。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2023 Feb;23(1):42-47. doi: 10.18295/squmj.1.2022.005. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
4
Optimal primary wound closure methods after thyroid and parathyroid surgery: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术后的最佳初次伤口闭合方法:随机临床试验的网络荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2023 Jan 6;7(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac170.
5
Comparison of Polymeric Cyanoacrylate Adhesives with Suturing in Free Gingival Graft Stability: A Split Mouth Trial.聚氰基丙烯酸酯粘合剂与缝合在游离龈移植稳定性方面的比较:一项双侧对照试验。
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Oct 16;13(20):3575. doi: 10.3390/polym13203575.
6
Wound Closure After Port Implantation-A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Tissue Adhesive and Intracutaneous Suturing.经皮穿刺端口植入术后的伤口闭合:组织粘合剂与皮内缝合的随机对照试验。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Nov 5;118(44):749-755. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0324.
7
Topical skin adhesives for laceration repair in children.用于儿童裂伤修复的局部皮肤粘合剂。
Can Fam Physician. 2021 Apr;67(4):260-262. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6704260.
8
Randomized clinical trial comparing skin closure with tissue adhesives subcuticular suture after robotic urogynecologic procedures.机器人泌尿妇科手术后皮肤缝合与组织粘合剂及皮下缝合的随机临床试验。
World J Methodol. 2020 Oct 28;10(1):1-6. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v10.i1.1.
9
Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive without subcuticular suture for wound closure after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective observational study on thirty-two cases with controls for 3 months follow-up.全髋关节置换术后使用不含皮下缝合的辛酯-2-氰基丙烯酸酯组织粘合剂闭合伤口:一项对32例患者进行3个月随访对照的前瞻性观察研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct 10;15(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01997-9.
10
Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.非产科手术中用于皮肤缝合的皮下缝合线
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 9;4(4):CD012124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012124.pub2.