Stroke Division, Florey Neuroscience Institutes, Melbourne, Australia.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Apr;24(4):557-67. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211001980. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
Research in both humans and animals indicates that physical activity can enhance cognitive activity, but whether this is true in patients with stroke is largely unknown.We aimed to evaluate the relationship between increased physical activity after stroke and cognitive performance.
A systematic review was conducted of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and other electronic databases. All randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical studies that evaluated the effect of physical activity or exercise on cognitive function in stroke were included. Study quality was assessed using four criteria concerning sources of bias (use of randomization, allocation concealment, blinding of outcome assessment, whether all patients were accounted for in outcome data).
The literature search (first run in 2008, updated in 2011) yielded 12 studies that satisfied inclusion criteria. Exercise interventions were heterogeneous; some studies compared different intensities of movement rehabilitation, others included a specific exercise program. Cognitive function was rarely the primary outcome measure, and cognitive assessment tools used were generally suboptimal. Nine studies had sufficient data to be included in a meta-analysis, which indicated a significant benefit of intervention over control (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.04–0.36; z = 2.43, p = 0.015). Studies that met all four quality criteria reported smaller treatment benefit than studies that did not.
There is some evidence that increased physical activity after stroke enhances cognitive performance. The pool of studies identified, however, was small and methodological shortcomings were widespread.
人类和动物的研究表明,身体活动可以增强认知活动,但这种情况在中风患者中是否属实还知之甚少。我们旨在评估中风后身体活动增加与认知表现之间的关系。
对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO 和其他电子数据库进行了系统综述。所有评估身体活动或运动对中风患者认知功能影响的随机对照试验和对照临床试验均包括在内。使用关于偏倚来源的四项标准(随机化、分配隐藏、结果评估的盲法、是否所有患者均纳入结局数据)评估研究质量。
文献检索(首次于 2008 年进行,2011 年更新)共获得 12 项符合纳入标准的研究。运动干预措施具有异质性;一些研究比较了不同强度的运动康复,另一些研究则包括了特定的运动方案。认知功能很少是主要的结局指标,而且使用的认知评估工具通常也不理想。有 9 项研究有足够的数据可用于荟萃分析,表明干预组优于对照组(SMD=0.20,95%CI:0.04-0.36;z=2.43,p=0.015)。符合所有四项质量标准的研究报告的治疗效果比不符合标准的研究小。
有一些证据表明,中风后增加身体活动可以提高认知表现。但已确定的研究数量较少,且方法学缺陷普遍存在。