Department of Political and Cultural Studies, College of Arts and Humanities, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Int J Drug Policy. 2012 Jan;23(1):72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
March 2011 marked the 50th anniversary of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. This legal instrument, the bedrock of the current United Nations based global drug control regime, is often viewed as merely a consolidating treaty bringing together the multilateral drug control agreements that preceded it; an erroneous position that does little to provide historical context for contemporary discussions surrounding revision of the international treaty system.
This article applies both historical and international relations perspectives to revisit the development of the Convention. Framing discussion within the context of regime theory, a critique of the foundational pre-1961 treaties is followed by detailed content analysis of the official records of the United Nations conference for the adoption of a Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs and, mindful of later treaties, an examination of the treaty's status as a 'single' convention.
The Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs represents a significant break with the regulative focus of the preceding multilateral treaties; a shift towards a more prohibitive outlook that within international relations terms can be regarded as a change of regime rather than the straightforward codification of earlier instruments. In this respect, the article highlights the abolition of drug use that for centuries had been embedded in the social, cultural and religious traditions of many non-Western states. Further, although often-overlooked, the Convention has failed in its aim of being the 'single' instrument within international drug control. The supplementing treaties developed in later years and under different socio-economic and political circumstances have resulted in significant inconsistencies within the control regime.
Having established that a shift in normative focus has taken place in the past, the article concludes that it is timely for the international community to revisit the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs with a view to correcting past errors and inconsistencies within the regime, particularly those relating to Scheduling and traditional drug use.
2011 年 3 月标志着《麻醉品单一公约》通过 50 周年。这一法律文书是当前联合国主导的全球毒品管制制度的基石,通常被视为仅仅是一项巩固性条约,将之前的多边药物管制协定汇集在一起;这种错误立场几乎没有为围绕修订国际条约制度的当代讨论提供历史背景。
本文运用历史和国际关系的观点重新审视了公约的发展。在制度理论的框架内进行讨论,对 1961 年之前的基础条约进行批判,然后对联合国通过《麻醉品单一公约》会议的正式记录进行详细的内容分析,并考虑到后来的条约,审查该条约作为“单一”公约的地位。
《麻醉品单一公约》代表了与先前多边条约的监管重点的重大突破;从国际关系的角度来看,这是一种更加禁止性的观点,可以被视为制度的改变,而不是早期文书的简单编纂。在这方面,本文强调了废除几个世纪以来一直嵌入许多非西方国家的社会、文化和宗教传统中的药物使用。此外,尽管经常被忽视,但《公约》未能实现其作为国际毒品管制单一文书的目标。后来在不同的社会经济和政治环境下制定的补充条约导致管制制度内出现了重大的不一致。
本文认为,过去规范重点已经发生了转变,因此国际社会及时重新审议《麻醉品单一公约》,以期纠正制度内过去的错误和不一致之处,特别是与分类和传统药物使用有关的错误和不一致之处。