• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药品调度的全球政治经济学:《管制物质法》的国际历史背景。

The global political economy of scheduling: the international-historical context of the Controlled Substances Act.

作者信息

McAllister William B

机构信息

Office of the Historian, US State Department, SA-1, 2401 E. Street, N.W., Room L-409, Washington, DC 20522, USA.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Oct 5;76(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.02.012.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.02.012
PMID:15380283
Abstract

This article explains the international context of regulation to control addicting substances that gave rise to schedules. It discusses the impact of scheduling decisions on subsequent national drug control legislation and international drug control negotiations, highlighting how the creation of schedules introduced new incentives and rewards into calculations about the national/international commerce in drugs. In particular, the schedules affected the development and clinical application of psychotropic substances, and the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances receives special focus. The roles of governmental representatives, pharmaceutical company interests, medical researchers, physicians, and pharmacists are highlighted. The article illustrates how debates about scheduling in international treaties over the previous 40 years impacted the creation of the 1970 Controlled Substances Act in the United States and how the constituencies that contributed to constructing the Controlled Substances Act viewed their efforts in a global context.

摘要

本文解释了对成瘾物质进行管制的国际背景,正是这种管制催生了药品管制目录。文章讨论了药品管制目录决策对后续国家药物管制立法和国际药物管制谈判的影响,强调了药品管制目录的制定如何在有关药品国内/国际贸易的考量中引入了新的激励措施和奖励机制。特别是,药品管制目录影响了精神药物的研发和临床应用,1971年《精神药物公约》受到了特别关注。文中突出了政府代表、制药公司利益相关方、医学研究人员、医生和药剂师所发挥的作用。本文阐述了过去40年国际条约中有关药品管制目录的争论如何影响了美国1970年《管制物质法》的制定,以及促成该法的各方如何在全球背景下看待他们的努力。

相似文献

1
The global political economy of scheduling: the international-historical context of the Controlled Substances Act.药品调度的全球政治经济学:《管制物质法》的国际历史背景。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Oct 5;76(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.02.012.
2
Regime change: re-visiting the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs.体制变革:重新审视 1961 年《麻醉品单一公约》。
Int J Drug Policy. 2012 Jan;23(1):72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
3
The ratification of the Convention on Psychotropic Substances 1971 and its transposition into national legislation in the Federal Republic of Germany.《1971年精神药物公约》的批准及其在德意志联邦共和国转化为国家立法。
Bull Narc. 1982 Jul-Dec;34(3-4):1-19.
4
Medicines and the drug control treaties: is buprenorphine for opioid addiction at risk of being lost?药品与药物管制条约:用于阿片类药物成瘾的丁丙诺啡会面临流失风险吗?
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2004 Jun;19(4):215-24. doi: 10.1002/hup.588.
5
The Controlled Substances Act: how a "big tent" reform became a punitive drug law.《管制物质法》:一项“包容性”改革如何变成一部惩罚性毒品法律。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Oct 5;76(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.04.012.
6
Addiction concepts and international control.成瘾概念与国际管控。
Soc Hist Alcohol Drugs. 2006 Spring;21(2):276-89.
7
The monitoring of trade in and control of psychotropic substances to guard against their diversion.监测精神药物的贸易并对其进行管制,以防其被挪用。
Bull Narc. 1983 Oct-Dec;35(4):3-13.
8
Drugs, the criminal law, and the administration of justice.毒品、刑法与司法行政
Milbank Q. 1991;69(4):529-60.
9
Debating the Controlled Substances Act.关于《管制物质法》的辩论。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Oct 5;76(1):17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.04.011.
10
Study on exempted preparations.豁免制剂研究。
Bull Narc. 1983 Jan-Mar;35(1):17-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Fentanyl-related substance scheduling as an effective drug control strategy.将芬太尼相关物质列入附表作为一种有效的药物管制策略。
J Forensic Sci. 2021 Jul;66(4):1186-1200. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14712. Epub 2021 May 5.
2
An Ethical Exploration of Barriers to Research on Controlled Drugs.对管制药品研究障碍的伦理探讨
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(4):36-47. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1145282.