Pieters Toine
Freudenthal Institute and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Psychoactives. 2023 Nov 3;2(4):317-336. doi: 10.3390/psychoactives2040020.
The ravaging COVID-19 pandemic has almost pushed into oblivion the fact that the United States is still struggling with an immense addiction crisis. Drug overdose deaths rose from 16,849 in 1999 to nearly 110000-of which an estimated 75,000 involved opioids-in 2022. On a yearly basis, the opioid casualty rate is higher than the combined number of victims of firearm violence and car accidents. The Covid-19 epidemic might have helped to worsen the addiction crisis by stimulating drug use among adolescents and diverting national attention to yet another public health crisis. In the past decade the sharpest increase in deaths occurred among those related to fentanyl and fentanyl analogs (illicitly manufactured, synthetic opioids of greater potency). In the first opioid crisis wave (1998-2010), opioid-related deaths were mainly associated with prescription opioids such as Oxycontin (oxycodone hydrochloride). The mass prescription of these narcotic drugs did anything but control the pervasive phenomenon of 'addiction on prescription' that played such an important role in the emergence and robustness of the US opioid crisis. Using a long-term drug lifecycle analytic approach in this article I will show how opioid producing pharmaceutical companies created a medical market for opioid painkillers. They thus fueled a consumer demand for potent opioid drugs that was eagerly capitalized on by criminal entrepreneurs and their international logistic networks. I will also point out the failure of US authorities to effectively respond to this crisis due to the gap between narcotic product regulation, regulation of marketing practices and the rise of a corporate dominated health care system. Ironically, this turned the most powerful geopolitical force in the war against drugs into its greatest victim. Due to formulary availability and regulatory barriers to accessibility European countries have been relatively protected against following suit the US opioid crisis.
肆虐的新冠疫情几乎让人们忘却了美国仍在与严重的成瘾危机作斗争这一事实。药物过量致死人数从1999年的16849人上升至2022年的近11万,其中估计有7.5万人涉及阿片类药物。按年计算,阿片类药物造成的死亡率高于枪支暴力和车祸受害者的总数。新冠疫情可能通过刺激青少年吸毒以及将国家注意力转移到另一场公共卫生危机上,从而加剧了成瘾危机。在过去十年中,与芬太尼及芬太尼类似物(非法制造的、效力更强的合成阿片类药物)相关的死亡人数增长最为显著。在第一轮阿片类药物危机浪潮(1998 - 2010年)中,与阿片类药物相关的死亡主要与诸如奥施康定(盐酸羟考酮)等处方阿片类药物有关。这些麻醉药品的大规模处方非但没有控制住“处方成瘾”这一普遍现象,而这种现象在美国阿片类药物危机的出现和蔓延中起到了重要作用。在本文中,我将采用长期药物生命周期分析方法,展示阿片类药物生产制药公司如何为阿片类止痛药创造了一个医疗市场。他们进而助长了对强效阿片类药物的消费者需求,而犯罪企业家及其国际物流网络急切地利用了这一需求。我还将指出,由于麻醉产品监管、营销行为监管与企业主导的医疗保健系统兴起之间存在差距,美国当局未能有效应对这一危机。具有讽刺意味的是,这使得在禁毒战争中最强大的地缘政治力量沦为了最大的受害者。由于药品目录供应情况以及获取方面的监管障碍,欧洲国家相对受到保护,未出现类似美国的阿片类药物危机。