• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

QUAGOL:定性数据分析指南。

QUAGOL: a guide for qualitative data analysis.

机构信息

Centre of Health Services and Nursing Research, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 blok d - bus 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Mar;49(3):360-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.012. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.012
PMID:21996649
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data analysis is a complex and contested part of the qualitative research process, which has received limited theoretical attention. Researchers are often in need of useful instructions or guidelines on how to analyze the mass of qualitative data, but face the lack of clear guidance for using particular analytic methods.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this paper is to propose and discuss the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL), a guide that was developed in order to be able to truly capture the rich insights of qualitative interview data.

METHOD

The article describes six major problems researchers are often struggling with during the process of qualitative data analysis. Consequently, the QUAGOL is proposed as a guide to facilitate the process of analysis. Challenges emerged and lessons learned from own extensive experiences with qualitative data analysis within the Grounded Theory Approach, as well as from those of other researchers (as described in the literature), were discussed and recommendations were presented. Strengths and pitfalls of the proposed method were discussed in detail.

RESULTS

The Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL) offers a comprehensive method to guide the process of qualitative data analysis. The process consists of two parts, each consisting of five stages. The method is systematic but not rigid. It is characterized by iterative processes of digging deeper, constantly moving between the various stages of the process. As such, it aims to stimulate the researcher's intuition and creativity as optimal as possible.

CONCLUSION

The QUAGOL guide is a theory and practice-based guide that supports and facilitates the process of analysis of qualitative interview data. Although the method can facilitate the process of analysis, it cannot guarantee automatic quality. The skills of the researcher and the quality of the research team remain the most crucial components of a successful process of analysis. Additionally, the importance of constantly moving between the various stages throughout the research process cannot be overstated.

摘要

背景

数据分析是定性研究过程中复杂且有争议的一部分,它受到的理论关注有限。研究人员通常需要关于如何分析大量定性数据的有用说明或指导,但他们面临缺乏特定分析方法使用的明确指导的困境。

目的

本文旨在提出和讨论莱顿定性分析指南(QUAGOL),该指南的开发目的是能够真正捕捉定性访谈数据的丰富见解。

方法

本文描述了研究人员在定性数据分析过程中经常遇到的六个主要问题。因此,提出 QUAGOL 作为分析过程的指南。讨论了从扎根理论方法中自身广泛的定性数据分析经验以及其他研究人员(如文献中所述)中出现的挑战和经验教训,并提出了建议。详细讨论了所提出方法的优缺点。

结果

莱顿定性分析指南(QUAGOL)提供了一种全面的方法来指导定性数据分析过程。该过程由两部分组成,每部分包含五个阶段。该方法是系统的,但不是僵化的。它的特点是迭代的深入挖掘过程,不断在过程的各个阶段之间移动。因此,它旨在尽可能地激发研究人员的直觉和创造力。

结论

QUAGOL 指南是一种基于理论和实践的指南,支持和促进定性访谈数据的分析过程。尽管该方法可以促进分析过程,但它不能保证自动的质量。研究人员的技能和研究团队的质量仍然是成功分析过程的最关键组成部分。此外,在整个研究过程中不断在各个阶段之间移动的重要性怎么强调都不为过。

相似文献

1
QUAGOL: a guide for qualitative data analysis.QUAGOL:定性数据分析指南。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Mar;49(3):360-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.012. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
2
A health researcher's guide to qualitative methodologies.健康研究人员定性研究方法指南。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007 Oct;31(5):433-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00114.x.
3
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
4
Complex Qualitative Data Analysis: Lessons Learned From the Experiences With the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven.复杂定性数据分析:从鲁汶定性分析指南的经验中汲取的教训。
Qual Health Res. 2021 May;31(6):1083-1093. doi: 10.1177/1049732320966981. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
5
Concurrent analysis: towards generalisable qualitative research.并发分析:走向可推广的定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Oct;20(19-20):2868-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03513.x. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
6
[Qualitative methods in medical research--preconditions, potentials and limitations].[医学研究中的定性方法——前提条件、潜力与局限]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2002 Oct 20;122(25):2468-72.
7
A participatory group process to analyze qualitative data.一个用于分析定性数据的参与式小组过程。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Summer;2(2):161-70. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0010.
8
Theoretical sampling and category development in grounded theory.扎根理论中的理论抽样与类别发展
Qual Health Res. 2007 Oct;17(8):1137-48. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308450.
9
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
10
Grounded theory research: literature reviewing and reflexivity.扎根理论研究:文献综述与反思性
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Nov;60(3):334-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04436.x.

引用本文的文献

1
"Just put in a little more effort": the help-seeking experience of patients living with obesity.“再稍微努力一点”:肥胖症患者的求助经历
Int J Obes (Lond). 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1038/s41366-025-01867-6.
2
The Contribution of Chaplaincy to Primary and Community Care: A Semi-Structured Interview Study With Clients.牧师关怀对初级和社区护理的贡献:一项对服务对象的半结构化访谈研究
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251357528. doi: 10.1177/21501319251357528. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
3
Vulnerability in research ethics: A systematic review of policy guidelines and documents.
研究伦理中的脆弱性:政策指南与文件的系统综述
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 1;20(7):e0327086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327086. eCollection 2025.
4
Evaluating the Impact on Pain Perceptions, Pain Intensity, and Physical Activity of a Mobile App to Empower Employees With Musculoskeletal Pain: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.评估一款旨在帮助患有肌肉骨骼疼痛的员工的移动应用程序对疼痛感知、疼痛强度和身体活动的影响:混合方法试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 27;9:e67886. doi: 10.2196/67886.
5
Factors that Facilitate or Hamper Oncology Nurse's Delivery of Spiritual Care in China: A Qualitative Study.促进或阻碍中国肿瘤护理人员提供精神照护的因素:一项定性研究
J Relig Health. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s10943-025-02362-y.
6
Conscientious objection in euthanasia and assisted suicide: A systematic review.安乐死和协助自杀中的良心拒斥:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0326142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326142. eCollection 2025.
7
Developing a Family Medicine Program in Jordan: appraisal of trainees and trainers and final assessment outcomes.在约旦开展家庭医学项目:对学员和培训师的评估及最终评估结果
MedEdPublish (2016). 2025 Apr 29;14:276. doi: 10.12688/mep.20687.3. eCollection 2024.
8
The development of BE-EMPOWERed: Belgian program Enhancing the uptake and Effectiveness of a Multifactorial falls Prevention intervention in Older community-dWElling peRsons.BE-EMPOWERed项目的开展:比利时提高老年社区居民多因素跌倒预防干预措施的采用率和有效性项目
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jun 5;25(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05879-9.
9
Perspective of parents of children with type 1 diabetes on the future of their child: a qualitative study.1型糖尿病患儿家长对孩子未来的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Jun 3;9(1):e003387. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003387.
10
Clarifying the meaning of a positive living environment in nursing homes: A scoping review protocol.阐明养老院积极生活环境的含义:一项范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2025 May 29;20(5):e0324336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324336. eCollection 2025.