Suppr超能文献

举重训练与传统举重训练相比,会引起膝关节肌肉协同收缩的不同适应性改变。

Olympic weightlifting training causes different knee muscle-coactivation adaptations compared with traditional weight training.

机构信息

Laboratory of Neuromechanics, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki at Serres, Serres, Greece.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Aug;26(8):2192-201. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823b087a.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of an Olympic weightlifting (OL) and traditional weight (TW) training program on muscle coactivation around the knee joint during vertical jump tests. Twenty-six men were assigned randomly to 3 groups: the OL (n = 9), the TW (n = 9), and Control (C) groups (n = 8). The experimental groups trained 3 d · wk(-1) for 8 weeks. Electromyographic (EMG) activity from the rectus femoris and biceps femoris, sagittal kinematics, vertical stiffness, maximum height, and power were collected during the squat jump, countermovement jump (CMJ), and drop jump (DJ), before and after training. Knee muscle coactivation index (CI) was calculated for different phases of each jump by dividing the antagonist EMG activity by the agonist. Analysis of variance showed that the CI recorded during the preactivation and eccentric phases of all the jumps increased in both training groups. The OL group showed a higher stiffness and jump height adaptation than the TW group did (p < 0.05). Further, the OL showed a decrease or maintenance of the CI recorded during the propulsion phase of the CMJ and DJs, which is in contrast to the increase in the CI observed after TW training (p < 0.05). The results indicated that the altered muscle activation patterns about the knee, coupled with changes of leg stiffness, differ between the 2 programs. The OL program improves jump performance via a constant CI, whereas the TW training caused an increased CI, probably to enhance joint stability.

摘要

本研究旨在比较奥林匹克举重(OL)和传统举重(TW)训练计划对垂直跳跃测试中膝关节周围肌肉协同激活的影响。26 名男性被随机分为 3 组:OL 组(n=9)、TW 组(n=9)和对照组(C 组)(n=8)。实验组每周训练 3 天,共 8 周。在训练前后,收集了深蹲跳、反向跳(CMJ)和跳深跳(DJ)过程中股四头肌和股二头肌的肌电图(EMG)活动、矢状面运动学、垂直刚度、最大高度和功率。通过将拮抗肌 EMG 活动除以主动肌,计算不同跳跃阶段的膝关节肌肉协同激活指数(CI)。方差分析显示,所有跳跃的预激活和离心阶段的 CI 在两个训练组中均增加。OL 组的刚度和跳跃高度适应性比 TW 组更高(p<0.05)。此外,OL 组在 CMJ 和 DJ 的推进阶段记录的 CI 下降或保持不变,而 TW 训练后观察到 CI 增加(p<0.05)。结果表明,两种方案对膝关节周围肌肉激活模式的改变,以及腿部刚度的变化不同。OL 方案通过恒定的 CI 提高跳跃性能,而 TW 训练导致 CI 增加,可能是为了增强关节稳定性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验