Javaheri M, Maleki-Kambakhsh S, Etemad-Moghadam Sh
Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
J Dent (Tehran). 2010 Spring;7(2):71-6. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of two caries detector dyes in the diagnosis of dental caries.
Twenty extracted human posterior teeth without pulpal exposure were sectioned mesiodistally through the center of the lesions using a water-cooled disk. The tooth halves were randomly divided into two groups and treated with Caries Detector (CD) and Caries Check (CC) detector dyes. Access cavities were prepared followed by caries removal and dye application. All cavities were arbitrarily divided into two right and left sections and excavation of the stained areas was performed on the left parts, while the right sections remained untouched. Bacterial penetration into dentinal tubules was evaluated using Gram-stained decalcified sections under light microscopy. Sensitivity and specificity of both dyes were calculated.
The sensitivity of CD and CC were 74% and 71%, respectively. The specificity obtained for both dyes was 100%.
Considering the low sensitivity of the dyes evaluated in the present study, it seems that they may not be reliable when used as the sole diagnostic technique for detection of carious lesions in posterior teeth.
本研究旨在评估两种龋齿检测染料在龋齿诊断中的疗效。
选取20颗未露髓的拔除人类后牙,使用水冷盘从病变中心近远中向切开。将牙齿半片随机分为两组,分别用龋齿探测器(CD)和龋齿检查(CC)检测染料处理。制备进入洞,随后去除龋坏组织并应用染料。所有洞均任意分为左右两部分,对左侧部分进行染色区域的挖掘,而右侧部分保持不变。在光学显微镜下使用革兰氏染色脱钙切片评估细菌向牙本质小管的侵入情况。计算两种染料的敏感性和特异性。
CD和CC的敏感性分别为74%和71%。两种染料的特异性均为100%。
考虑到本研究中评估的染料敏感性较低,当用作检测后牙龋损的唯一诊断技术时,它们似乎不可靠。