Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
J Phys Chem B. 2011 Dec 8;115(48):14217-28. doi: 10.1021/jp2050788. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
The study of hydration, folding, and interaction of proteins by volumetric measurements has been promoted by recent advances in the development of highly sensitive instrumentations. However, the separation of the measured apparent volumes into contributions from the protein and the hydration water, V(app) = V(int) + ΔV, is still challenging, even with the detailed microscopic structural information from molecular simulations. By the examples of the amyloidogenic polypeptides hIAPP and Aβ42 in aqueous solution, we analyze molecular dynamics simulation runs for different temperatures, using the Voronoi-Delaunay tessellation method. This method allows a parameter free determination of the intrinsic volume V(int) of complex solute molecules without any additional assumptions. For comparison, we also use fused sphere calculations, which deliver van der Waals and solute accessible surface volumes as special cases. The apparent volume V(app) of the solute molecules is calculated by different approaches, using either a traditional distance based selection of hydration water or the construction of sequential Voronoi shells. We find an astonishing coincidence with the predictions of a simple empirical approach, which is based on experimentally determined amino acid side chain contributions (Biophys. Chem.1999, 82, 35). The intrinsic volumes of the polypeptides are larger than their apparent volumes and also increase with temperature. This is due to a negative contribution of the hydration water ΔV to the apparent volume. The absolute value of this contribution is less than 10% of the intrinsic volume for both molecules and decreases with temperature. Essential volumetric differences between hydration water and bulk water are observed in the nearest neighborhood of the solute only, practically in the first two Delaunay sublayers of the first Voronoi shell. This also helps to understand the pressure dependence of the partial molar volumes of proteins.
近年来,高度敏感仪器的发展促进了通过体积测量研究蛋白质的水合、折叠和相互作用。然而,即使有来自分子模拟的详细微观结构信息,将测量的表观体积分解为蛋白质和水化水的贡献,V(app)=V(int)+ΔV,仍然具有挑战性。通过在水溶液中淀粉样多肽 hIAPP 和 Aβ42 的例子,我们分析了不同温度下的分子动力学模拟运行,使用 Voronoi-Delaunay 细分方法。该方法允许在没有任何其他假设的情况下,对复杂溶质分子的固有体积 V(int)进行参数自由确定。为了进行比较,我们还使用融合球计算,它提供了范德华和可及溶质表面体积作为特例。通过不同的方法计算溶质分子的表观体积 V(app),使用传统的基于距离的水化水选择或顺序 Voronoi 壳的构建。我们发现与一种简单经验方法的预测惊人地吻合,该方法基于实验确定的氨基酸侧链贡献(Biophys. Chem.1999, 82, 35)。多肽的固有体积大于它们的表观体积,并且随温度升高而增加。这是由于水化水 ΔV 对表观体积的负贡献。对于这两种分子,该贡献的绝对值小于固有体积的 10%,并且随温度降低。仅在溶质的最近邻处观察到水化水和体相水之间的基本体积差异,实际上在第一个 Voronoi 壳的前两个 Delaunay 子层中。这还有助于理解蛋白质偏摩尔体积的压力依赖性。