Texas Health Institute, USA.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011 Oct;5(3):227-34. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2011.72.
Racially/ethnically diverse communities suffer a disproportionate burden of adverse outcomes before, during and after a disaster. Using California as a locus of study, we sought to identify challenges and barriers to meeting the preparedness needs of these communities and highlight promising strategies, gaps in programs, and future priorities.
We conducted a literature review, environmental scan of organizational Web sites providing preparedness materials for diverse communities, and key informant interviews with public health and emergency management professionals.
We identified individual-level barriers to preparing diverse communities such as socioeconomic status, trust, culture, and language, as well as institutional-level barriers faced by organizations such as inadequate support for culturally/linguistically appropriate initiatives. Current programs to address these barriers include language assistance services, community engagement strategies, cross-sector collaboration, and community assessments. Enhancing public-private partnerships, increasing flexibility in allocating funds and improving organizational capacity for diversity initiatives were all identified as additional areas of programmatic need.
Our study suggests at least four intervention priorities for California and across the United States: engaging diverse communities in all aspects of emergency planning, implementation, and evaluation; mitigating fear and stigma; building organizational cultural competence; and enhancing coordination of information and resources. In addition, this study provides a methodological model for other states seeking to assess their capacity to integrate diverse communities into preparedness planning and response.
在灾难之前、期间和之后,不同种族/族裔的社区承受着不成比例的不良后果。以加利福尼亚为研究地点,我们试图确定满足这些社区备灾需求的挑战和障碍,并强调有前途的策略、项目中的差距以及未来的优先事项。
我们进行了文献回顾、对为不同社区提供备灾材料的组织网站进行环境扫描,以及对公共卫生和应急管理专业人员进行重点信息提供者访谈。
我们确定了个人层面上准备不同社区的障碍,例如社会经济地位、信任、文化和语言,以及组织层面上的障碍,例如缺乏对文化/语言适宜举措的支持。目前解决这些障碍的方案包括语言援助服务、社区参与策略、跨部门合作和社区评估。加强公私伙伴关系、增加资金分配的灵活性以及提高组织多样性举措的能力,都被确定为方案需求的其他领域。
我们的研究表明,加利福尼亚州乃至美国至少有四个干预重点:让不同社区参与应急规划、实施和评估的各个方面;减轻恐惧和耻辱感;建立组织文化能力;加强信息和资源的协调。此外,这项研究为其他寻求评估将不同社区纳入备灾规划和应对能力的州提供了一种方法学模式。