Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt Implementation Sciences Laboratory, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):392-400. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000432. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
The goal of this study was to develop an in-depth understanding of how a health information exchange (HIE) fits into clinical workflow at multiple clinical sites.
The ethnographic qualitative study was conducted over a 9-month period in six emergency departments (ED) and eight ambulatory clinics in Memphis, Tennessee, USA. Data were collected using direct observation, informal interviews during observation, and formal semi-structured interviews. The authors observed for over 180 h, during which providers used the exchange 130 times.
HIE-related workflow was modeled for each ED site and ambulatory clinic group and substantial site-to-site workflow differences were identified. Common patterns in HIE-related workflow were also identified across all sites, leading to the development of two role-based workflow models: nurse based and physician based. The workflow elements framework was applied to the two role-based patterns. An in-depth description was developed of how providers integrated HIE into existing clinical workflow, including prompts for HIE use.
Workflow differed substantially among sites, but two general role-based HIE usage models were identified. Although providers used HIE to improve continuity of patient care, patient-provider trust played a significant role. Types of information retrieved related to roles, with nurses seeking to retrieve recent hospitalization data and more open-ended usage by nurse practitioners and physicians. User and role-specific customization to accommodate differences in workflow and information needs may increase the adoption and use of HIE.
Understanding end users' perspectives towards HIE technology is crucial to the long-term success of HIE. By applying qualitative methods, an in-depth understanding of HIE usage was developed.
本研究旨在深入了解健康信息交换(HIE)如何融入多个临床地点的临床工作流程。
本民族志定性研究在美国田纳西州孟菲斯市的 6 个急诊部(ED)和 8 个门诊诊所进行了 9 个月。数据收集采用直接观察、观察期间的非正式访谈和正式半结构化访谈。作者观察了超过 180 小时,在此期间,医务人员使用该交换系统 130 次。
为每个 ED 地点和门诊诊所组建模了与 HIE 相关的工作流程,并确定了实质性的地点间工作流程差异。还在所有地点中确定了与 HIE 相关的工作流程中的常见模式,从而开发了两种基于角色的工作流程模型:护士主导和医生主导。工作流程元素框架应用于两种基于角色的模式。详细描述了医务人员如何将 HIE 整合到现有的临床工作流程中,包括使用 HIE 的提示。
工作流程在各地点之间存在很大差异,但确定了两种通用的基于角色的 HIE 使用模型。尽管医务人员使用 HIE 来改善患者护理的连续性,但患者与医务人员之间的信任起着重要作用。检索的信息类型与角色相关,护士寻求检索最近的住院数据,而护士从业者和医生则进行更开放的使用。针对用户和角色的特定定制,以适应工作流程和信息需求的差异,可能会增加 HIE 的采用和使用。
了解最终用户对 HIE 技术的看法对于 HIE 的长期成功至关重要。通过应用定性方法,深入了解了 HIE 的使用情况。