Ageing and Stroke Medicine Medical Physics Groups, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Diabet Med. 2012 May;29(5):609-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03497.x.
This study investigated dynamic cerebral autoregulation in Type 2 diabetes, where dynamic cerebral autoregulation may be impaired as a consequence of microvascular changes and/or autonomic neuropathy.
Eleven healthy control subjects and 11 age- and sex-matched patients with Type 2 diabetes controlled with lifestyle modifications or oral anti-diabetes treatment were recruited. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation was calculated by the autoregressive moving average autoregulatory index from a continuous blood pressure and R-R interval (time between each ventricular systole) recording. End-tidal carbon dioxide was also monitored and changes in response to breath holding and hyperventilation as a metabolic stimulus were measured.
No significant differences were seen in cerebral blood flow velocity at baseline, or in response to breath holding between people with diabetes and control subjects, although the cerebral blood flow velocity response associated with hyperventilation was significantly reduced in the diabetes group. No significant differences in dynamic cerebral autoregulation were seen at baseline or in response to respiratory manoeuvres between the groups.
Dynamic cerebral autoregulation is not impaired in patients with Type 2 diabetes, although a small difference could not be excluded as the study was only powered to detect an autoregulatory index difference > 2 units. Further study in a larger population with a spectrum of disease severity may reveal clinically important differences.
本研究旨在探讨 2 型糖尿病患者的动态脑自动调节功能,由于微血管变化和/或自主神经病变,可能会损害动态脑自动调节功能。
招募了 11 名健康对照者和 11 名年龄和性别匹配的 2 型糖尿病患者,这些患者通过生活方式改变或口服抗糖尿病治疗来控制病情。通过自回归移动平均自动调节指数,从连续血压和 R-R 间隔(每个心室收缩之间的时间)记录中计算出动态脑自动调节。还监测了呼气末二氧化碳,并测量了呼吸暂停和过度通气作为代谢刺激时的变化。
糖尿病患者和对照组在基线时的脑血流速度或呼吸暂停时的反应没有显著差异,尽管糖尿病组的过度通气相关脑血流速度反应明显降低。两组在基线或呼吸操作时的动态脑自动调节均无显著差异。
2 型糖尿病患者的动态脑自动调节功能并未受损,尽管由于本研究仅能检测到 > 2 个单位的自动调节指数差异,因此不能排除存在较小差异。在更大的疾病严重程度谱人群中进行进一步研究可能会揭示出具有临床意义的差异。