Group Health Cooperative and School of Public Health of the University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):481-92. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00004.
False-positive mammography results are common. Biennial screening may decrease the cumulative probability of false-positive results across many years of repeated screening but could also delay cancer diagnosis.
To compare the cumulative probability of false-positive results and the stage distribution of incident breast cancer after 10 years of annual or biennial screening mammography.
Prospective cohort study.
7 mammography registries in the National Cancer Institute-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
169,456 women who underwent first screening mammography at age 40 to 59 years between 1994 and 2006 and 4492 women with incident invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2006.
False-positive recalls and biopsy recommendations stage distribution of incident breast cancer.
False-positive recall probability was 16.3% at first and 9.6% at subsequent mammography. Probability of false-positive biopsy recommendation was 2.5% at first and 1.0% at subsequent examinations. Availability of comparison mammograms halved the odds of a false-positive recall (adjusted odds ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.56]). When screening began at age 40 years, the cumulative probability of a woman receiving at least 1 false-positive recall after 10 years was 61.3% (CI, 59.4% to 63.1%) with annual and 41.6% (CI, 40.6% to 42.5%) with biennial screening. Cumulative probability of false-positive biopsy recommendation was 7.0% (CI, 6.1% to 7.8%) with annual and 4.8% (CI, 4.4% to 5.2%) with biennial screening. Estimates were similar when screening began at age 50 years. A non-statistically significant increase in the proportion of late-stage cancers was observed with biennial compared with annual screening (absolute increases, 3.3 percentage points [CI, -1.1 to 7.8 percentage points] for women age 40 to 49 years and 2.3 percentage points [CI, -1.0 to 5.7 percentage points] for women age 50 to 59 years) among women with incident breast cancer.
Few women underwent screening over the entire 10-year period. Radiologist characteristics influence recall rates and were unavailable. Most mammograms were film rather than digital. Incident cancer was analyzed in a small sample of women who developed cancer.
After 10 years of annual screening, more than half of women will receive at least 1 false-positive recall, and 7% to 9% will receive a false-positive biopsy recommendation. Biennial screening appears to reduce the cumulative probability of false-positive results after 10 years but may be associated with a small absolute increase in the probability of late-stage cancer diagnosis.
National Cancer Institute.
假阳性的乳房 X 光检查结果很常见。每两年进行一次筛查可能会降低多年重复筛查中假阳性结果的累积概率,但也可能会延迟癌症的诊断。
比较每年或每两年进行一次乳房 X 光筛查 10 年后假阳性结果的累积概率和新发乳腺癌的分期分布。
前瞻性队列研究。
美国国立癌症研究所资助的乳腺癌监测联盟的 7 个乳房 X 光检查登记处。
1994 年至 2006 年间 40 岁至 59 岁之间进行首次筛查乳房 X 光检查的 169456 名女性和 1996 年至 2006 年间诊断出的 4492 名新发浸润性乳腺癌女性。
假阳性召回和活检建议的新发乳腺癌分期分布。
首次乳房 X 光检查的假阳性召回率为 16.3%,随后为 9.6%。首次检查假阳性活检建议的概率为 2.5%,随后为 1.0%。有对比乳房 X 光片可使假阳性召回的几率减半(调整后的比值比,0.50 [95%置信区间,0.45 至 0.56])。当筛查从 40 岁开始时,10 年后至少有 1 次假阳性召回的女性累积概率为 61.3%(CI,59.4%至 63.1%),每年筛查为 41.6%(CI,40.6%至 42.5%),每两年筛查为 41.6%(CI,40.6%至 42.5%)。假阳性活检建议的累积概率为 7.0%(CI,6.1%至 7.8%),每年筛查为 4.8%(CI,4.4%至 5.2%),每两年筛查为 4.8%(CI,4.4%至 5.2%)。当筛查从 50 岁开始时,结果也相似。与每年筛查相比,每两年筛查发现晚期癌症的比例略有增加(40 岁至 49 岁女性的绝对增加为 3.3 个百分点[CI,-1.1 至 7.8 个百分点],50 岁至 59 岁女性为 2.3 个百分点[CI,-1.0 至 5.7 个百分点]),但无统计学意义。女性中存在乳腺癌的发生。
很少有女性接受了整个 10 年的筛查。放射科医生的特征会影响召回率,但这些特征无法获得。大多数乳房 X 光片是胶片而不是数字的。对发生的癌症的分析仅限于发展为癌症的女性的小样本。
每年进行一次筛查 10 年后,超过一半的女性将至少接受 1 次假阳性召回,7%至 9%的女性将接受假阳性活检建议。每两年进行一次筛查似乎可以降低 10 年后假阳性结果的累积概率,但可能会导致晚期癌症诊断的绝对概率略有增加。
美国国立癌症研究所。