Suppr超能文献

10 年筛查性乳房 X 光摄影后假阳性召回或活检建议的累积概率:一项队列研究。

Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

机构信息

Group Health Cooperative and School of Public Health of the University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):481-92. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

False-positive mammography results are common. Biennial screening may decrease the cumulative probability of false-positive results across many years of repeated screening but could also delay cancer diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cumulative probability of false-positive results and the stage distribution of incident breast cancer after 10 years of annual or biennial screening mammography.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

7 mammography registries in the National Cancer Institute-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

PARTICIPANTS

169,456 women who underwent first screening mammography at age 40 to 59 years between 1994 and 2006 and 4492 women with incident invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2006.

MEASUREMENTS

False-positive recalls and biopsy recommendations stage distribution of incident breast cancer.

RESULTS

False-positive recall probability was 16.3% at first and 9.6% at subsequent mammography. Probability of false-positive biopsy recommendation was 2.5% at first and 1.0% at subsequent examinations. Availability of comparison mammograms halved the odds of a false-positive recall (adjusted odds ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.56]). When screening began at age 40 years, the cumulative probability of a woman receiving at least 1 false-positive recall after 10 years was 61.3% (CI, 59.4% to 63.1%) with annual and 41.6% (CI, 40.6% to 42.5%) with biennial screening. Cumulative probability of false-positive biopsy recommendation was 7.0% (CI, 6.1% to 7.8%) with annual and 4.8% (CI, 4.4% to 5.2%) with biennial screening. Estimates were similar when screening began at age 50 years. A non-statistically significant increase in the proportion of late-stage cancers was observed with biennial compared with annual screening (absolute increases, 3.3 percentage points [CI, -1.1 to 7.8 percentage points] for women age 40 to 49 years and 2.3 percentage points [CI, -1.0 to 5.7 percentage points] for women age 50 to 59 years) among women with incident breast cancer.

LIMITATIONS

Few women underwent screening over the entire 10-year period. Radiologist characteristics influence recall rates and were unavailable. Most mammograms were film rather than digital. Incident cancer was analyzed in a small sample of women who developed cancer.

CONCLUSION

After 10 years of annual screening, more than half of women will receive at least 1 false-positive recall, and 7% to 9% will receive a false-positive biopsy recommendation. Biennial screening appears to reduce the cumulative probability of false-positive results after 10 years but may be associated with a small absolute increase in the probability of late-stage cancer diagnosis.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Cancer Institute.

摘要

背景

假阳性的乳房 X 光检查结果很常见。每两年进行一次筛查可能会降低多年重复筛查中假阳性结果的累积概率,但也可能会延迟癌症的诊断。

目的

比较每年或每两年进行一次乳房 X 光筛查 10 年后假阳性结果的累积概率和新发乳腺癌的分期分布。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

设置

美国国立癌症研究所资助的乳腺癌监测联盟的 7 个乳房 X 光检查登记处。

参与者

1994 年至 2006 年间 40 岁至 59 岁之间进行首次筛查乳房 X 光检查的 169456 名女性和 1996 年至 2006 年间诊断出的 4492 名新发浸润性乳腺癌女性。

测量

假阳性召回和活检建议的新发乳腺癌分期分布。

结果

首次乳房 X 光检查的假阳性召回率为 16.3%,随后为 9.6%。首次检查假阳性活检建议的概率为 2.5%,随后为 1.0%。有对比乳房 X 光片可使假阳性召回的几率减半(调整后的比值比,0.50 [95%置信区间,0.45 至 0.56])。当筛查从 40 岁开始时,10 年后至少有 1 次假阳性召回的女性累积概率为 61.3%(CI,59.4%至 63.1%),每年筛查为 41.6%(CI,40.6%至 42.5%),每两年筛查为 41.6%(CI,40.6%至 42.5%)。假阳性活检建议的累积概率为 7.0%(CI,6.1%至 7.8%),每年筛查为 4.8%(CI,4.4%至 5.2%),每两年筛查为 4.8%(CI,4.4%至 5.2%)。当筛查从 50 岁开始时,结果也相似。与每年筛查相比,每两年筛查发现晚期癌症的比例略有增加(40 岁至 49 岁女性的绝对增加为 3.3 个百分点[CI,-1.1 至 7.8 个百分点],50 岁至 59 岁女性为 2.3 个百分点[CI,-1.0 至 5.7 个百分点]),但无统计学意义。女性中存在乳腺癌的发生。

局限性

很少有女性接受了整个 10 年的筛查。放射科医生的特征会影响召回率,但这些特征无法获得。大多数乳房 X 光片是胶片而不是数字的。对发生的癌症的分析仅限于发展为癌症的女性的小样本。

结论

每年进行一次筛查 10 年后,超过一半的女性将至少接受 1 次假阳性召回,7%至 9%的女性将接受假阳性活检建议。每两年进行一次筛查似乎可以降低 10 年后假阳性结果的累积概率,但可能会导致晚期癌症诊断的绝对概率略有增加。

主要资金来源

美国国立癌症研究所。

相似文献

1
Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):481-92. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00004.
4
5
Impact of mammography screening interval on breast cancer diagnosis by menopausal status and BMI.
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Nov;28(11):1454-62. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2507-0. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
7
Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13;173(9):807-16. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.307.
8
Toward the breast screening balance sheet: cumulative risk of false positives for annual versus biennial mammograms commencing at age 40 or 50.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jan;149(1):211-21. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3226-x. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
9
Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1615-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13183.
10
The cumulative risk of false-positive results in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: updated results.
Cancer. 2013 Nov 15;119(22):3952-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28320. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

2
Reducing unnecessary biopsies of BI-RADS 4 lesions based on a deep learning model for mammography.
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 3;15:1543553. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1543553. eCollection 2025.
5
Past, present, and future of electrical impedance tomography and myography for medical applications: a scoping review.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Dec 11;12:1486789. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1486789. eCollection 2024.
7
Machine learning can reliably predict malignancy of breast lesions based on clinical and ultrasonographic features.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jun;211(3):581-593. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07429-0. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
10
ESR Essentials: screening for breast cancer - general recommendations by EUSOBI.
Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6348-6357. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10740-5. Epub 2024 Apr 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jul 21;102(14):1040-51. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq233. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
3
Modelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2010 Oct;19(5):429-49. doi: 10.1177/0962280209359842. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
4
Uncertainty during breast diagnostic evaluation: state of the science.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010 Jan;37(1):77-83. doi: 10.1188/10.ONF.77-83.
5
Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):727-37, W237-42. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009.
6
Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):716-26, W-236. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00008.
7
Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.
Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):641-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533082308. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
8
Decreased accuracy in interpretation of community-based screening mammography for women with multiple clinical risk factors.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;63(4):441-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
10
Pain in different methods of breast biopsy: emphasis on vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Breast. 2008 Feb;17(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.039. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验