Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012 Jul;15(6):715-25. doi: 10.1017/S146114571100112X. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to compare the efficacy of escitalopram (20 mg/d) in combination with fixed doses of gaboxadol to escitalopram (20 mg) in the treatment of patients with severe major depressive disorder (MDD). Adult patients were randomized to 8 wk of double-blind treatment with fixed doses of placebo (n=71), escitalopram (20 mg, n=140), escitalopram (20 mg)+gaboxadol (5 mg) (n=139), or escitalopram (20 mg)+gaboxadol (10 mg) (n=140). The pre-defined primary analysis of efficacy was an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) of change from baseline to endpoint (week 8) in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score using last observation carried forward (LOCF). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean change from baseline in MADRS total score between the 20 mg escitalopram+10 mg gaboxadol group and the 20 mg escitalopram group [difference=-0.45 MADRS points (95% CI -2.5 to 1.6, p=0.6619, full analysis set (FAS), LOCF, ANCOVA)] at week 8. The mean treatment differences to placebo at week 8 were -5.6 (95% CI -8.0 to -3.1, p<0.0001) (20 mg escitalopram), -5.1 (95% CI -7.5 to -2.7, p<0.0001) (20 mg escitalopram+5 mg gaboxadol), and -6.0 (95% CI -8.4 to -3.6, p<0.0001) (20 mg escitalopram+10 mg gaboxadol). The most common adverse events reported in the active treatment groups for which the incidence was higher than that in the placebo group, comprised nausea, anxiety and insomnia. There were no clinically relevant efficacy differences between a combination of escitalopram and gaboxadol compared to escitalopram alone in the treatment of severe MDD. All active treatment groups were superior in efficacy to placebo and were well tolerated.
这项概念验证研究的目的是比较艾司西酞普兰(20 毫克/天)联合固定剂量加巴喷丁与艾司西酞普兰(20 毫克)治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的疗效。成年患者被随机分配接受 8 周的双盲治疗,接受固定剂量的安慰剂(n=71)、艾司西酞普兰(20 毫克,n=140)、艾司西酞普兰(20 毫克)+加巴喷丁(5 毫克)(n=139)或艾司西酞普兰(20 毫克)+加巴喷丁(10 毫克)(n=140)。疗效的预先定义的主要分析是使用最后一次观测值向前结转(LOCF),对从基线到终点(第 8 周)的蒙哥马利-Åsberg 抑郁评定量表(MADRS)总分的变化进行协方差分析(ANCOVA)。在第 8 周时,20 毫克艾司西酞普兰+10 毫克加巴喷丁组与 20 毫克艾司西酞普兰组之间,从基线到 MADRS 总分的平均变化没有统计学意义上的差异[差异=-0.45 MADRS 点(95%CI-2.5 至 1.6,p=0.6619,完全分析集(FAS),LOCF,ANCOVA)]。第 8 周时与安慰剂的平均治疗差异分别为-5.6(95%CI-8.0 至-3.1,p<0.0001)(20 毫克艾司西酞普兰)、-5.1(95%CI-7.5 至-2.7,p<0.0001)(20 毫克艾司西酞普兰+5 毫克加巴喷丁)和-6.0(95%CI-8.4 至-3.6,p<0.0001)(20 毫克艾司西酞普兰+10 毫克加巴喷丁)。在活性治疗组中报告的最常见不良事件,其发生率高于安慰剂组,包括恶心、焦虑和失眠。与单独使用艾司西酞普兰相比,艾司西酞普兰与加巴喷丁联合治疗重度 MDD 没有临床相关的疗效差异。所有活性治疗组均优于安慰剂,且耐受性良好。