Pehrson Alan L, Sanchez Connie
External Sourcing and Scientific Excellence, Lundbeck Research USA, Paramus, NJ, USA.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Jan 19;9:603-24. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S62912. eCollection 2015.
Evidence suggesting that central nervous system γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentrations are reduced in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) has been present since at least 1980, and this idea has recently gained support from more recent magnetic resonance spectroscopy data. These observations have led to the assumption that MDD's underlying etiology is tied to an overall reduction in GABA-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission. In this paper, we review the mechanisms that govern GABA and glutamate concentrations in the brain, and provide a comprehensive and critical evaluation of the clinical data supporting reduced GABA neurotransmission in MDD. This review includes an evaluation of magnetic resonance spectroscopy data, as well as data on the expression and function of the GABA-synthesizing enzyme glutamic acid decarboxylase, GABA neuron-specific cell markers, such as parvalbumin, calretinin and calbindin, and the GABAA and GABAB receptors in clinical MDD populations. We explore a potential role for glial pathology in MDD-related reductions in GABA concentrations, and evidence of a connection between neurosteroids, GABA neurotransmission, and hormone-related mood disorders. Additionally, we investigate the effects of GABAergic pharmacological agents on mood, and demonstrate that these compounds have complex effects that do not universally support the idea that reduced GABA neurotransmission is at the root of MDD. Finally, we discuss the connections between serotonergic and GABAergic neurotransmission, and show that two serotonin-focused antidepressants - the selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine and the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine - modulate GABA neurotransmission in opposing ways, despite both being effective MDD treatments. Altogether, this review demonstrates that there are large gaps in our understanding of the relationship between GABA physiology and MDD, which must be remedied with more data from well-controlled empirical studies. In conclusion, this review suggests that the simplistic notion that MDD is caused by reduced GABA neurotransmission must be discarded in favor of a more nuanced and complex model of the role of inhibitory neurotransmission in MDD.
至少自1980年以来,就有证据表明重度抑郁症(MDD)患者中枢神经系统γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)浓度降低,最近的磁共振波谱数据也支持了这一观点。这些观察结果导致人们推测,MDD的潜在病因与GABA介导的抑制性神经传递的总体减少有关。在本文中,我们回顾了调节大脑中GABA和谷氨酸浓度的机制,并对支持MDD中GABA神经传递减少的临床数据进行了全面而批判性的评估。这篇综述包括对磁共振波谱数据的评估,以及关于GABA合成酶谷氨酸脱羧酶的表达和功能、GABA神经元特异性细胞标志物(如小白蛋白、钙视网膜蛋白和钙结合蛋白)以及临床MDD人群中GABAA和GABAB受体的数据。我们探讨了胶质细胞病理学在MDD相关的GABA浓度降低中的潜在作用,以及神经甾体、GABA神经传递和激素相关情绪障碍之间联系的证据。此外,我们研究了GABA能药物对情绪的影响,并证明这些化合物具有复杂的作用,并不普遍支持GABA神经传递减少是MDD根源的观点。最后,我们讨论了5-羟色胺能和GABA能神经传递之间的联系,并表明两种以5-羟色胺为重点的抗抑郁药——选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂氟西汀和多模式抗抑郁药伏硫西汀——以相反的方式调节GABA神经传递,尽管两者都是有效的MDD治疗药物。总之,这篇综述表明,我们对GABA生理学与MDD之间关系的理解存在很大差距,必须通过更多来自严格控制的实证研究的数据来弥补。总之,这篇综述表明,认为MDD是由GABA神经传递减少引起的简单观念必须摒弃,转而支持一种更细致入微和复杂的抑制性神经传递在MDD中作用的模型。