Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871104, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USA.
Physiol Behav. 2012 Feb 1;105(3):749-56. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
Adolescence is a period of enhanced sensitivity to social influences and vulnerability to drug abuse. Social reward in adolescent rats has been demonstrated with the conditioned place preference (CPP) model, but it is not clear whether limited contact with another rat without play is sufficient to produce reward. We investigated this issue using an apparatus containing two main compartment, each with a wire mesh barrier that allowed rats placed on either side of the barrier to have limited physical contact. Adolescent male rats were given two conditioning sessions/day for 2 or 8 days following baseline preference tests. Rats were placed into their preferred side alone for one daily 10-min session and into their initially non-preferred side (i.e., CS) for the other session during which they either had restricted or unrestricted physical access to another rat (Rat/Mesh or Rat/Phys, respectively) or to a tennis ball (Ball/Mesh or Ball/Phys, respectively) unconditioned stimulus (US). Only the Rat/Phys group exhibited CPP after 2 CS-US pairings; however, after 8 CS-US pairings, the Rat/Mesh and Ball/Phys groups also exhibited CPP. During conditioning, the rat US elicited more robust approach and contact behavior compared to the ball, regardless of physical or restricted access. The incidence of contact and/or approach increased as the number of exposures increased. The results suggest that the rank order of US reward efficacy was physical contact with a rat>limited contact with a rat>physical contact with a ball, and that rough-and-tumble play is not necessary to establish social reward-CPP. The findings have important implications for emerging drug self-administration models in which two rats self-administering drug intravenously have limited physical contact via a mesh barrier shared between their respective operant conditioning chambers.
青春期是对社会影响高度敏感和易滥用药物的时期。在青春期大鼠中,已经通过条件位置偏好(CPP)模型证明了社会奖励,但尚不清楚与另一只大鼠没有玩耍的有限接触是否足以产生奖励。我们使用一个包含两个主要隔间的设备来研究这个问题,每个隔间都有一个金属丝网屏障,允许放置在屏障两侧的大鼠进行有限的身体接触。在基线偏好测试后,青春期雄性大鼠每天接受两次条件作用,持续 2 或 8 天。大鼠每天单独进入其首选侧进行一次 10 分钟的 1 次疗程,而在另一次疗程中,它们要么与另一只大鼠(Rat/Mesh 或 Rat/Phys,分别)或网球(Ball/Mesh 或 Ball/Phys,分别)有受限或不受限的身体接触作为无条件刺激(US)。只有 Rat/Phys 组在 2 次 CS-US 配对后表现出 CPP;然而,在 8 次 CS-US 配对后,Rat/Mesh 和 Ball/Phys 组也表现出 CPP。在条件作用过程中,与球相比,大鼠 US 引发了更强烈的接近和接触行为,无论身体接触是否受限。接触和/或接近的发生率随着暴露次数的增加而增加。结果表明,US 奖励效力的等级顺序为与大鼠的身体接触>与大鼠的有限接触>与球的身体接触,并且打闹玩耍不是建立社会奖励-CPP 所必需的。这些发现对新兴的药物自我给药模型具有重要意义,在这些模型中,两只大鼠通过各自操作条件室之间共享的网状屏障进行静脉内药物自我给药,身体接触有限。