Suppr超能文献

系统评价和荟萃分析:肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂预防心房颤动复发:未实现的希望。

Systematic review and meta-analysis: renin-Angiotensin system inhibitors in the prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrences: an unfulfilled hope.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2012 Feb;26(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s10557-011-6346-0.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze the published data on the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs) in secondary prevention of AF. Some post-hoc analyses from trials in different clinical scenarios suggested the efficacy of ACEIs and ARBs in the prevention of new onset atrial fibrillation (AF), while their efficacy in preventing AF recurrences is notably controversial.

METHODS

The authors reviewed all published prospective, randomized vs. placebo or no-treatment studies, concerning the effect of ACEIs and ARBs in the prevention of AF recurrences. Four ACEIs studies accounting for a total of 355 patients and six ARBs studies comprising 4.040 patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

The pooled ACEIs data showed a statistical significant effect in preventing AF recurrences. However, the studies did not have a robust follow-up algorithm to recognize AF episodes, and were individually very small. On the contrary, pooled ARBs data did not show any effect in preventing AF recurrences (RR 0.90; 95% CI, 0.75-1.08; p = 0.24). The ARBs analyzed population was much larger in three large prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-control trials with transtelephoning monitoring of AF recurrences and neutral results. The meta-analysis of ACEIs and ARBs trials together could suggest a publication bias that may result in an overestimation of the treatment effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently there is no role for ARBs in secondary prevention of AF. With regard to ACEIs, the data are not strong enough for a conclusion, although the efficacy is expected to be the same as that of ARBs.

摘要

目的

分析发表的关于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)在房颤二级预防中作用的研究数据。一些来自不同临床情况的试验的事后分析表明 ACEI 和 ARB 对预防新发房颤(AF)有效,而其预防 AF 复发的疗效则存在较大争议。

方法

作者检索了所有发表的前瞻性、随机对照安慰剂或空白对照研究,分析 ACEI 和 ARB 预防 AF 复发的疗效。分析了 4 项 ACEI 研究(共 355 例患者)和 6 项 ARB 研究(共 4040 例患者)。

结果

ACEI 汇总数据显示预防 AF 复发有统计学意义的效果。然而,这些研究没有可靠的随访算法来识别 AF 发作,而且每个研究的规模都很小。相反,ARB 汇总数据并未显示任何预防 AF 复发的效果(RR 0.90;95%CI,0.75-1.08;p=0.24)。在 3 项大型前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,ARB 分析人群规模较大,且使用远程遥测监测 AF 复发,结果为中性。对 ACEI 和 ARB 试验的荟萃分析提示可能存在发表偏倚,导致对治疗效果的高估。

结论

目前 ARB 不能用于 AF 的二级预防。ACEI 的证据不够充分,尽管疗效预期与 ARB 相同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验