Suppr超能文献

非体外循环或体外循环减至最小的冠状动脉手术——以循环内皮细胞(CEC)作为组织损伤超敏标志物的初步经验。

Off-pump or minimized on-pump coronary surgery--initial experience with Circulating Endothelial Cells (CEC) as a supersensitive marker of tissue damage.

作者信息

Wittwer Thorsten, Choi Yeong-Hoon, Neef Klaus, Schink Mareike, Sabashnikov Anton, Wahlers Thorsten

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Oct 19;6:142. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-6-142.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Off-pump-coronary-artery-bypass-grafting (OPCAB) and minimized-extracorporeal-circulation (Mini-HLM) have been proposed to avoid harmful effects of cardiopulmonary-bypass (CPB). Controversies exist whether OPCAB is still superior in perioperative outcome. Circulating endothelial cells (CEC) are sensitive markers of endothelial damage and are significantly elevated in conventional-CPB-procedures as compared to Mini-HLM-revascularisation. Therefore, CEC might be of specific value in evaluating effectiveness of Mini-HLM and OPCAB as currently applied less-invasive coronary procedures.

METHODS

76 coronary patients were randomly assigned either to OPCAB (n = 34) or to Mini-HLM (ROCsafe™, Terumo Inc., n = 42) procedures. Perioperative data, clinical and serological outcome and measurements of CEC-release and parameters of endothelial function (v.Willebrand-Factor, soluble-thrombomodulin) perioperatively (pre-operative-baseline, post-Mini-HLM/release of OPCAB-stabilizer, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 5 days postoperatively) were obtained and compared by ANOVA models including repeated-measures-analysis.

RESULTS

Mean graft-number was 3.06 ± 0.72 in Mini-HLM-patients and 1.89 ± 0.74 in OPCAB-patients (p < 0.001). However, ventilation-, ICU- and total-hospital duration were comparable between groups as well as chest-tube-drainage, transfusion requirements, hemodynamics and catecholaminergic support (p > 0.05). CEC-release did not differ between groups (p = 0.274) and was generally within normal limits, Troponin-T levels where not significanty different (p = 0.108). No myocardial infarctions, strokes or deaths occurred, neuron specific enolase (NSE) did not show any differences between groups (p = 0.194).

CONCLUSION

Conceptional advantages of minimized CPB systems (ROCsafe™) result in morbidity and mortality comparable with OPCAB procedures. Mini-HLM therefore minimizes CPB-related systemic and organ injury as demonstrated by low CEC-values which indicates intact endothelial integrity. Furthermore, Mini-HLM combines OPCAB-benefits with low morbidity in high-risk patients while facilitating more complete revascularization in complex patients.

摘要

背景

非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)和微创体外循环(Mini-HLM)已被提出用于避免体外循环(CPB)的有害影响。OPCAB在围手术期结果方面是否仍具有优势存在争议。循环内皮细胞(CEC)是内皮损伤的敏感标志物,与Mini-HLM血管重建相比,在传统CPB手术中显著升高。因此,CEC在评估Mini-HLM和OPCAB作为目前应用的微创冠状动脉手术的有效性方面可能具有特定价值。

方法

76例冠心病患者被随机分配接受OPCAB(n = 34)或Mini-HLM(ROCsafe™,Terumo公司,n = 42)手术。获取围手术期数据、临床和血清学结果以及围手术期(术前基线、Mini-HLM后/OPCAB稳定器释放后、术后6小时、12小时、24小时和5天)CEC释放量和内皮功能参数(血管性血友病因子、可溶性血栓调节蛋白)的测量值,并通过包括重复测量分析的方差分析模型进行比较。

结果

Mini-HLM组患者的平均移植血管数为3.06±0.72,OPCAB组为1.89±0.74(p < 0.001)。然而,两组之间的通气、重症监护病房和总住院时间以及胸管引流、输血需求、血流动力学和儿茶酚胺能支持相当(p > 0.05)。两组之间的CEC释放量无差异(p = 0.274),且总体在正常范围内,肌钙蛋白-T水平无显著差异(p = 0.108)。未发生心肌梗死、中风或死亡,神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)组间无差异(p = 0.194)。

结论

微创CPB系统(ROCsafe™)的概念优势导致其发病率和死亡率与OPCAB手术相当。因此,Mini-HLM将CPB相关的全身和器官损伤降至最低,低CEC值表明内皮完整性完好。此外,Mini-HLM在高危患者中将OPCAB的益处与低发病率相结合,同时便于复杂患者进行更完全的血管重建。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64cb/3228796/cb2fe1bae8b5/1749-8090-6-142-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验