Brenner Maria, Hilliard Carol, Peel Glynis, Crispino Gloria, Geraghty Ruth, OʼCallaghan Gill
From *University College Dublin, Ireland; †Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Crumlin, Ireland; ‡Statistica Medica Ltd., Ireland; and §National University of Ireland Maynooth, Ireland.
J Burn Care Res. 2015 Jan-Feb;36(1):159-66. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000161.
Skin grafts are used to treat many types of skin defects in children, including burns, traumatic wounds, and revision of scars. The objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare the effectiveness of three dressing types for pediatric donor sites: foam, hydrofiber, and calcium alginate. Children attending a pediatric Burns & Plastics Service from October 2010 to March 2013, who required a split-skin graft, were recruited to the trial. Patients were randomly assigned to the two experimental groups, foam or hydrofiber, and to the control group, calcium alginate. Data were gathered on the management of exudate, assessment of pain, time to healing, and infection. Fifty-seven children aged 1 to 16 years (mean = 4.9 years) were recruited to the trial. Fifty-six patients had evaluable data and one participant from the control group was lost to follow-up. Most children required skin grafting for a burn injury (78%). The median size of the donor site was 63.50 cm (8-600 cm). There was a statistically significant difference in time to healing across the three dressing groups (x [2, n = 56] = 6.59, P = .037). The calcium alginate group recorded a lower median value of days to healing (median = 7.5 days) compared to the other two groups, which recorded median values of 8 days (hydrofiber) and 9.5 days (foam). The greatest leakage of exudate, regardless of dressing type, occurred on day 2 after grafting. No statistically significant difference was found in leakage of exudate, pain scores, or infection rates across the three groups. Calcium alginate emerged as the optimum dressing for pediatric donor site healing in this trial.
皮肤移植用于治疗儿童多种类型的皮肤缺损,包括烧伤、创伤性伤口以及瘢痕修复。这项前瞻性随机对照试验的目的是比较三种敷料类型用于小儿供皮区的有效性:泡沫敷料、水凝胶纤维敷料和藻酸钙敷料。2010年10月至2013年3月在小儿烧伤与整形科就诊且需要进行中厚皮片移植的儿童被纳入该试验。患者被随机分配到两个试验组,即泡沫敷料组或水凝胶纤维敷料组,以及对照组藻酸钙敷料组。收集了有关渗出液处理、疼痛评估、愈合时间和感染情况的数据。57名年龄在1至16岁(平均4.9岁)的儿童被纳入该试验。56名患者有可评估数据,对照组有1名参与者失访。大多数儿童因烧伤需要进行皮肤移植(78%)。供皮区的中位面积为63.50平方厘米(8 - 600平方厘米)。三个敷料组在愈合时间上存在统计学显著差异(χ[2, n = 56] = 6.59,P = 0.037)。与其他两组相比,藻酸钙敷料组的愈合天数中位数较低(中位数 = 7.5天),其他两组的中位数分别为8天(水凝胶纤维敷料)和9.5天(泡沫敷料)。无论敷料类型如何,渗出液渗漏最多的情况发生在植皮后第2天。三组在渗出液渗漏、疼痛评分或感染率方面未发现统计学显著差异。在该试验中,藻酸钙敷料成为小儿供皮区愈合的最佳敷料。