Suppr超能文献

亚胺培南或头孢哌酮-舒巴坦联合万古霉素用于治疗中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者的疑似或确诊感染。

Imipenem or cefoperazone-sulbactam combined with vancomycin for therapy of presumed or proven infection in neutropenic cancer patients.

作者信息

Bodey G, Abi-Said D, Rolston K, Raad I, Whimbey E

机构信息

Department of Medical Specialties, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Aug;15(8):625-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01691147.

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the efficacy and safety of imipenem and cefoperazone-sulbactam combined with vancomycin for the treatment of fever in neutropenic cancer patients. Patients were assigned to either imipenem 500 mg/m2 (500 mg for bone marrow transplant recipients) every 6 h or cefoperazone (2 g)-sulbactam (1 g) every 8 h All patients received vancomycin 1 g every 12 h. A total of 457 febrile or infectious episodes occurring in 407 patients were entered in the study. The response rate was 73% for imipenem plus vancomycin and 74% for cefoperazone-sulbactam plus vancomycin among the 369 episodes that could be evaluated. Response rates were comparable for the two regimens with regard to infecting organism, administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis, and neutrophil count and trend. The frequency of side-effects was significantly higher for imipenem plus vancomycin (11% vs.5%, p = 0.02), due to therapy-associated nausea and vomiting (5.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.0004). The overall frequency of superinfections was similar with both regimens, but Clostridium difficile colitis occurred significantly more often in patients receiving imipenem plus vancomycin (5 vs. 0, p = 0.02). In this study cefoperazone-sulbactam plus vancomycin was an effective alternative to imipenem plus vancomycin for initial therapy of fever in neutropenic patients.

摘要

这项前瞻性随机研究的目的是比较亚胺培南与头孢哌酮-舒巴坦联合万古霉素治疗中性粒细胞减少癌症患者发热的疗效和安全性。患者被随机分为两组,一组每6小时静脉滴注亚胺培南500mg/m²(骨髓移植患者为500mg),另一组每8小时静脉滴注头孢哌酮(2g)-舒巴坦(1g),所有患者均每12小时静脉滴注万古霉素1g。共有407例患者出现457次发热或感染发作并纳入研究。在可评估的369次发作中,亚胺培南加万古霉素组的有效率为73%,头孢哌酮-舒巴坦加万古霉素组为74%。两种治疗方案在感染病原体、抗菌药物预防使用、中性粒细胞计数及变化趋势方面疗效相当。亚胺培南加万古霉素组的副作用发生率显著高于头孢哌酮-舒巴坦加万古霉素组(11%比5%,p=0.02),主要是与治疗相关的恶心和呕吐(5.3%比0%,p=0.0004)。两种治疗方案的二重感染总发生率相似,但接受亚胺培南加万古霉素治疗的患者艰难梭菌结肠炎的发生率显著更高(5例比0例,p=0.02)。在本研究中,头孢哌酮-舒巴坦加万古霉素是中性粒细胞减少患者发热初始治疗中亚胺培南加万古霉素的有效替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验