Suppr超能文献

两性霉素B输注时长1小时与4小时的随机双盲试验。

Randomized, double-blind trial of 1- versus 4-hour amphotericin B infusion durations.

作者信息

Oldfield E C, Garst P D, Hostettler C, White M, Samuelson D

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Naval Hospital, San Diego, California 92134-5000.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Jul;34(7):1402-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.7.1402.

Abstract

We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of 1- versus 4-h infusions of amphotericin B to determine whether there was any difference in infusion-related toxicity. A total of 128 maintenance infusions in 12 patients were studied; 62 were randomized to 1-h infusions (group A) and 66 were randomized to 4-h infusions (group B). We found no significant differences between patients in groups A and B in mean temperature, pulse, or systolic or diastolic blood pressure measured during the infusions. At a significant level of 0.05, the power to detect a mean difference in temperature of 2 degrees C, a pulse difference of 20 beats per min, a decrease in diastolic blood pressure of 10 mm Hg, or a decrease in systolic blood pressure of 20 mm Hg was 0.95. Rigors and chills were noted in 15 of 62 (24.1%) infusions in group A patients and 12 of 66 (18.1%) infusions in group B patients (P = 0.40). Meperidine was required because of severe persistent rigors in 6 of 62 (9.6%) infusions in group A patients and 6 of 66 (8.9%) infusions in group B patients (P = 0.91). An increase in temperature was noted in five (8%) of the group A infusions and seven (10.6%) of the group B infusions (P = 0.63). The mean time to onset of rigors, an increase in temperature, and an increase in pulse occurred significantly earlier in group A than in group B patients (P = 0.02 for all comparisons). We conclude that there is no difference in the incidence or severity of the infusion-related toxicity of amphotericin B with a 1-h infusion rate compared with a 4-h infusion rate. However, the onset of infusion-related toxicity occurs significantly earlier with a 1-h infusion.

摘要

我们进行了一项关于两性霉素B 1小时输注与4小时输注的随机双盲试验,以确定输注相关毒性是否存在差异。共研究了12例患者的128次维持输注;62例随机接受1小时输注(A组),66例随机接受4小时输注(B组)。我们发现,在输注过程中测量的A组和B组患者的平均体温、脉搏、收缩压或舒张压之间无显著差异。在0.05的显著水平下,检测体温平均差异2℃、脉搏差异每分钟20次、舒张压下降10 mmHg或收缩压下降20 mmHg的检验效能为0.95。A组患者的62次输注中有15次(24.1%)出现寒战,B组患者的66次输注中有12次(18.1%)出现寒战(P = 0.40)。A组患者的62次输注中有6次(9.6%)因严重持续寒战需要使用哌替啶,B组患者的66次输注中有6次(8.9%)需要使用(P = 0.91)。A组输注中有5次(8%)出现体温升高,B组输注中有7次(10.6%)出现体温升高(P = 0.63)。寒战、体温升高和脉搏加快的平均发作时间在A组患者中比B组患者显著更早出现(所有比较P = 0.02)。我们得出结论,两性霉素B 1小时输注率与4小时输注率相比,输注相关毒性的发生率和严重程度没有差异。然而,1小时输注时输注相关毒性的发作明显更早。

相似文献

3
Amphotericin B infusion-related toxicity: comparison of two- and four-hour infusions.
Ann Pharmacother. 1995 Nov;29(11):1081-7. doi: 10.1177/106002809502901101.
5
Effect of infusion rate on amphotericin B-associated febrile reactions.
Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1988 Oct;22(10):769-72. doi: 10.1177/106002808802201005.

引用本文的文献

2
Systemic antifungal agents.全身性抗真菌药物。
Indian J Pediatr. 2001 Jul;68(7):655-68. doi: 10.1007/BF02752281.
9
Effect of infusion rates on toxicity of amphotericin B.输注速率对两性霉素B毒性的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Nov;36(11):2573-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.11.2573.

本文引用的文献

3
Amphotericin B fever in rabbits.兔两性霉素B热
Life Sci. 1984 Mar 26;34(13):1249-52. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(84)90547-2.
4
Transient asystole associated with amphotericin B infusion.与两性霉素B输注相关的短暂性心脏停搏。
Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1983 Jul-Aug;17(7-8):547-8. doi: 10.1177/106002808301700711.
7
Antifungal agents used for deep-seated mycotic infections.用于深部真菌感染的抗真菌药物。
Mayo Clin Proc. 1987 Dec;62(12):1116-28. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62506-3.
9
Effect of infusion rate on amphotericin B-associated febrile reactions.
Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1988 Oct;22(10):769-72. doi: 10.1177/106002808802201005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验