Mathai Ashu S
Department of Anaesthesiology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Jul;55(4):325-33. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.84829.
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has emerged as a simpler and safer alternative to invasive mechanical ventilation in patients developing acute postoperative respiratory failure. The benefits of NIV as compared to intubation and mechanical ventilation include lower complications, shorter duration of hospital stay, reduced morbidity, lesser cost of treatment and even reduced mortality rates. However, its use may not be uniformly applicable in all patient groups. This article reviews the indications, contraindications and evidence supporting the use of NIV in individual patient groups in the postoperative period. The anaesthesiologist needs to recognise the subset of patients most likely to benefit from NIV therapy so as to apply it most effectively. It is equally important to promptly identify signs of failure of NIV therapy and be prepared to initiate alternate ways of respiratory support. The author searched PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE, without date restrictions. Search terms included Non-invasive ventilation, postoperative and respiratory failure. Foreign literature was included, though only articles with English translation were used.
无创正压通气或无创通气(NIV)已成为术后发生急性呼吸衰竭患者侵入性机械通气的一种更简单、更安全的替代方法。与插管和机械通气相比,NIV的益处包括并发症更少、住院时间更短、发病率降低、治疗成本更低,甚至死亡率也降低。然而,它的使用可能并非在所有患者群体中都普遍适用。本文综述了术后各患者群体中NIV使用的适应证、禁忌证及支持证据。麻醉医生需要识别出最有可能从NIV治疗中获益的患者亚组,以便最有效地应用它。同样重要的是,要及时识别NIV治疗失败的迹象,并准备好启动替代的呼吸支持方式。作者检索了PubMed和Ovid MEDLINE,无日期限制。检索词包括无创通气、术后和呼吸衰竭。纳入了国外文献,但仅使用有英文译文的文章。