Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, 10th Floor, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada.
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2011 Oct 20;11:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-11-12.
Despite Thailand's official reclassification of drug users as "patients" deserving care and not "criminals," the Thai government has continued to rely heavily on punitive responses to drug use such as "boot camp"-style compulsory "treatment" centers. There is very little research on experiences with compulsory treatment centers among people who use drugs. The work reported here is a first step toward filling that gap.
We examined experiences of compulsory drug treatment among 252 Thai people who inject drugs (IDU) participating in the Mitsampan Community Research Project in Bangkok. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with a history of compulsory treatment experience.
In total, 80 (31.7%) participants reported a history of compulsory treatment. In multivariate analyses, compulsory drug detention experience was positively associated with current spending on drugs per day (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.86; 95%CI: 1.07 - 3.22) and reporting drug planting by police (AOR = 1.81; 95%CI: 1.04 - 3.15). Among those with compulsory treatment experience, 77 (96.3%) reported injecting in the past week, and no difference in intensity of drug use was observed between those with and without a history of compulsory detention.
These findings raise concerns about the current approach to compulsory drug detention in Thailand. Exposure to compulsory drug detention was associated with police abuse and high rates of relapse into drug use, although additional research is needed to determine the precise impact of exposure to this form of detention on future drug use. More broadly, compulsory "treatment" based on a penal approach is not consistent with scientific evidence on addressing drug addiction and should be phased out in favor of evidence-based interventions.
尽管泰国将吸毒者重新归类为需要关怀而非惩罚的“病人”,但泰国政府仍继续严重依赖惩罚性手段来应对吸毒问题,例如“训练营”式的强制性“治疗”中心。关于吸毒者对强制治疗中心的体验,相关研究非常有限。本研究旨在填补这一空白。
我们调查了曼谷 Mitsampan 社区研究项目中 252 名泰国注射吸毒者(IDU)的强制戒毒经历。多变量逻辑回归用于确定与强制戒毒经历史相关的独立因素。
共有 80 名(31.7%)参与者报告有过强制戒毒经历。在多变量分析中,强制戒毒经历与当前每天毒品支出(调整后的优势比 [AOR] = 1.86;95%置信区间 [CI]:1.07-3.22)和报告警察种植毒品(AOR = 1.81;95%CI:1.04-3.15)呈正相关。在有强制戒毒经历的人中,77 人(96.3%)报告过去一周内有过注射行为,且有和无强制拘留史者的药物使用强度没有差异。
这些发现令人担忧泰国目前对强制戒毒的处理方式。强制戒毒经历与警察滥用职权和高复吸率有关,尽管需要进一步研究来确定接触这种拘留形式对未来药物使用的影响,但以惩罚为基础的强制性“治疗”不符合解决毒瘾的科学证据,应逐步淘汰,代之以基于证据的干预措施。