平衡公私伙伴关系的利益和风险,以应对全球营养不良的双重负担。
Balancing the benefits and risks of public-private partnerships to address the global double burden of malnutrition.
机构信息
WHO Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.
出版信息
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Mar;15(3):503-17. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011002060. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
OBJECTIVE
Transnational food, beverage and restaurant companies, and their corporate foundations, may be potential collaborators to help address complex public health nutrition challenges. While UN system guidelines are available for private-sector engagement, non-governmental organizations (NGO) have limited guidelines to navigate diverse opportunities and challenges presented by partnering with these companies through public-private partnerships (PPP) to address the global double burden of malnutrition.
DESIGN
We conducted a search of electronic databases, UN system websites and grey literature to identify resources about partnerships used to address the global double burden of malnutrition. A narrative summary provides a synthesis of the interdisciplinary literature identified.
RESULTS
We describe partnership opportunities, benefits and challenges; and tools and approaches to help NGO engage with the private sector to address global public health nutrition challenges. PPP benefits include: raising the visibility of nutrition and health on policy agendas; mobilizing funds and advocating for research; strengthening food-system processes and delivery systems; facilitating technology transfer; and expanding access to medications, vaccines, healthy food and beverage products, and nutrition assistance during humanitarian crises. PPP challenges include: balancing private commercial interests with public health interests; managing conflicts of interest; ensuring that co-branded activities support healthy products and healthy eating environments; complying with ethical codes of conduct; assessing partnership compatibility; and evaluating partnership outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
NGO should adopt a systematic and transparent approach using available tools and processes to maximize benefits and minimize risks of partnering with transnational food, beverage and restaurant companies to effectively target the global double burden of malnutrition.
目的
跨国食品、饮料和餐饮公司及其企业基金会可能是潜在的合作伙伴,可以帮助应对复杂的公共卫生营养挑战。虽然联合国系统有私营部门参与的准则,但非政府组织在通过公私伙伴关系(PPP)与这些公司合作以应对全球双重营养负担方面,其指导方针有限,难以应对多样化的机会和挑战。
设计
我们搜索了电子数据库、联合国系统网站和灰色文献,以确定用于解决全球双重营养负担的伙伴关系资源。叙述性摘要提供了对确定的跨学科文献的综合。
结果
我们描述了伙伴关系的机会、利益和挑战;以及工具和方法,帮助非政府组织与私营部门合作,应对全球公共卫生营养挑战。公私伙伴关系的好处包括:提高营养和健康在政策议程上的可见度;动员资金和倡导研究;加强食品系统的进程和交付系统;促进技术转让;在人道主义危机期间扩大药物、疫苗、健康食品和饮料产品以及营养援助的获取。公私伙伴关系的挑战包括:平衡私营商业利益与公共卫生利益;管理利益冲突;确保联合活动支持健康产品和健康饮食环境;遵守道德行为准则;评估伙伴关系兼容性;评估伙伴关系成果。
结论
非政府组织应采用系统和透明的方法,利用现有工具和流程,最大程度地提高与跨国食品、饮料和餐饮公司合作的利益,最大限度地降低风险,以有效应对全球双重营养负担。