The George Institute for Global Health Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Global Heath Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Global Health. 2023 Feb 21;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00912-1.
Multistakeholder collaboration has emerged as a dominant approach for engaging and mobilising non-state actors; notably embedded in the paradigm of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Yet, considerable ambiguity and contestation surrounds the appropriate terms of public private engagement (PPE) with industry actors.
This paper seeks to conceptualise different forms of engagement with the food industry in tackling diet-related noncommunicable disease, within the context of power asymmetries across engaged stakeholders. It does so by introducing the Governance Typology for Public Private Engagement in the Nutrition Sector, a typology for government-led engagement with food industry actors across three domains: (i) the form of industry and civil society actor engagement (i.e., rules of exercising institutional power), based on the degree of participation in formal decision-making as well as participation at different stages in the policy cycle; (ii) the type of industry actors being engaged (i.e., pre-existing power attributes), based on function, size, and product portfolios for profit; and (iii) the substantive policy focus of engagement.
The Governance Typology for Public Private Engagement in the Nutrition Sector seeks to inform national level nutrition policy makers on good engagement practice with food industry actors and complements existing risk assessment tools. This typology has the potential to inform decision-making on public sector engagement with other industries that profit from products detrimental to human and planetary health.
多方利益相关者合作已成为吸引和动员非国家行为者的主要方法;特别是嵌入在联合国可持续发展目标的范例中。然而,与行业参与者的公私伙伴关系(PPE)的适当术语仍然存在相当大的模糊性和争议。
正 文:本文旨在通过引入营养部门公私伙伴关系治理分类法,在参与方权力不对称的背景下,对解决与饮食相关的非传染性疾病的不同形式的食品行业参与进行概念化。该分类法针对政府在三个领域与食品行业参与者的主导型参与进行了分类:(i)行业和民间社会参与者参与的形式(即,行使机构权力的规则),其依据是正式决策参与的程度以及政策周期不同阶段的参与程度;(ii)参与的行业参与者的类型(即,预先存在的权力属性),基于功能、规模以及盈利产品组合;以及(iii)参与的实质性政策重点。
结 论:营养部门公私伙伴关系治理分类法旨在为国家营养政策制定者提供与食品行业参与者良好合作的实践信息,并补充现有的风险评估工具。该分类法有可能为公共部门与其他从危害人类和地球健康的产品中获利的行业的合作提供决策依据。