Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.
J Magn Reson. 2011 Dec;213(1):151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.09.042. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
Protein backbone 15N NMR spin relaxation rates are useful in characterizing the protein dynamics and structures. To observe the protein nuclear-spin resonances a pulse sequence has to include a water suppression scheme. There are two commonly employed methods, saturating or dephasing the water spins with pulse field gradients and keeping them unperturbed with flip-back pulses. Here different water suppression methods were incorporated into pulse sequences to measure 15N longitudinal T1 and transversal rotating-frame T1ρ spin relaxation. Unexpectedly the 15N T1 relaxation time constants varied significantly with the choice of water suppression method. For a 25-kDa Escherichiacoli. glutamine binding protein (GlnBP) the T1 values acquired with the pulse sequence containing a water dephasing gradient are on average 20% longer than the ones obtained using a pulse sequence containing the water flip-back pulse. In contrast the two T1ρ data sets are correlated without an apparent offset. The average T1 difference was reduced to 12% when the experimental recycle delay was doubled, while the average T1 values from the flip-back measurements were nearly unchanged. Analysis of spectral signal to noise ratios (s/n) showed the apparent slower 15N relaxation obtained with the water dephasing experiment originated from the differences in 1HN recovery for each relaxation time point. This in turn offset signal reduction from 15N relaxation decay. The artifact becomes noticeable when the measured 15N relaxation time constant is comparable to recycle delay, e.g., the 15N T1 of medium to large proteins. The 15N relaxation rates measured with either water suppression schemes yield reasonable fits to the structure. However, data from the saturated scheme results in significantly lower Model-Free order parameters (
蛋白质主链 15N NMR 自旋弛豫率可用于表征蛋白质动力学和结构。为了观察蛋白质核自旋共振,脉冲序列必须包括水抑制方案。有两种常用的方法,用脉冲场梯度饱和或去相水自旋,并使用翻转回波脉冲保持其不受干扰。这里将不同的水抑制方法纳入脉冲序列中,以测量 15N 纵向 T1 和横向旋转框架 T1ρ 自旋弛豫。出乎意料的是,15N T1 弛豫时间常数随水抑制方法的选择而显著变化。对于 25kDa 的大肠杆菌谷氨酸结合蛋白(GlnBP),用包含水去相梯度的脉冲序列获得的 T1 值比用包含水翻转回波脉冲的脉冲序列获得的 T1 值平均长 20%。相比之下,两个 T1ρ 数据集没有明显的偏移相关。当实验的循环延迟时间增加一倍时,平均 T1 差异减少到 12%,而翻转回波测量的平均 T1 值几乎不变。对谱信号噪声比(s/n)的分析表明,在用去相实验获得的明显较慢的 15N 弛豫来自于每个弛豫时间点的 1HN 恢复的差异。这反过来又抵消了 15N 弛豫衰减引起的信号减少。当测量的 15N 弛豫时间常数与循环延迟时间相当,例如中到大蛋白的 15N T1 时,这种人为现象变得明显。用两种水抑制方案测量的 15N 弛豫率与结构合理吻合。然而,饱和方案的数据导致显著较低的无模型自由度参数(