Glenthøj A, Sehested M, Torp-Pedersen S
Department of Pathology, University Hospital, Denmark.
Gut. 1990 Aug;31(8):930-3. doi: 10.1136/gut.31.8.930.
In 100 consecutive patients ultrasonically guided histological and cytological fine needle biopsy specimens were obtained from pancreatic lesions using two different needles with an outer diameter of 0.6 mm. Specimens taken by both cytological and histological fine needle biopsy were examined blindly by two pathologists. When related to the final and reliable diagnosis obtained in 57 patients, the predictive value of a malignant diagnosis was 1.00 for both types of biopsy. The predictive value for a benign diagnosis was 0.25 for histological specimens for both examiners and 0.33 and 0.45 for the two evaluations of the cytological specimens. False benign diagnoses seemed to be related to both sampling error and difficulties in interpreting the biopsy specimens. The intraobserver and interobserver kappa values concerning reproducibility of diagnoses were higher for histological specimens (0.80 and 0.74) than for cytological specimens (0.70 and 0.61). Consistent malignant diagnoses, however, occurred more often with cytological specimens (51 cases) than with histological specimens (39 cases) (p less than 0.05) and consistent diagnoses of insufficient material were more common with histological specimens (18 cases v six cases). Cytological fine needle biopsy seems to be the method of choice if only one method is used and a 0.6 mm needle is used.
对100例连续患者,使用两种外径为0.6 mm的不同针具,在超声引导下从胰腺病变处获取组织学和细胞学细针穿刺活检标本。细胞学和组织学细针穿刺活检所取标本由两位病理学家进行盲法检查。与57例患者最终获得的可靠诊断相比,两种活检类型的恶性诊断预测值均为1.00。两位检查者对组织学标本的良性诊断预测值均为0.25,对细胞学标本的两次评估预测值分别为0.33和0.45。假良性诊断似乎与抽样误差和活检标本解读困难均有关。组织学标本诊断重复性的观察者内和观察者间kappa值(分别为0.80和0.74)高于细胞学标本(分别为0.70和0.61)。然而,细胞学标本出现一致恶性诊断的情况(51例)比组织学标本(39例)更常见(p<0.05),且组织学标本出现一致的取材不足诊断更为常见(18例对6例)。如果仅使用一种方法且使用0.6 mm针具,细胞学细针穿刺活检似乎是首选方法。