Waldner B, Dorval E D, Anthonioz P, Huten N, Feil C, Bertrand J, Metman E H
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1987 Jan;11(1):12-6.
In this report, we examined the sensitivity and specificity of pancreatic fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Aspiration cytodiagnosis was performed in 45 patients (36 cancers and 9 benign pancreatic lesions) using a 22 Gauge fine needle either percutaneously in 25 patients with real-time ultrasonic guidance or during surgery in 20 patients. Cytologic examination included a precise description and the classification in one of the 4 Papanicolaou classes, the fourth only being considered as positive in terms of cancer. No complication occurred with either technic. Overall sensitivity was 75 p. 100, 74 p. 100 percutaneously and 77 p. 100 intraoperatively, but specificity was 78 p. 100 due to two false-positive results recorded among the 9 benign lesions. Retrospective analysis of cytologic examinations of the 29 class IV lesions led us to differentiate cases with "sure malignancy" (20 cases) from those with "strong suspicion of malignancy" (9 cases including the 2 false-positives). Only class IV lesions with "sure malignancy" call for aggressive treatment, whereas a "strong suspicion of malignancy", which may result from carcinoma or severe cellular abnormalities occasionally found in inflammatory pancreatic lesions, should lead to a second pancreatic aspiration.
在本报告中,我们研究了胰腺细针穿刺细胞学检查在胰腺癌诊断中的敏感性和特异性。对45例患者(36例癌症和9例胰腺良性病变)进行了穿刺细胞诊断,其中25例患者在实时超声引导下经皮穿刺,20例患者在手术中进行,均使用22号细针。细胞学检查包括精确描述并归类为巴氏分类的4类中的一类,只有第4类在癌症方面被视为阳性。两种技术均未发生并发症。总体敏感性为75%,经皮穿刺为74%,术中为77%,但由于9例良性病变中有2例假阳性结果,特异性为78%。对29例IV类病变的细胞学检查进行回顾性分析,使我们能够将“肯定恶性”(20例)与“高度怀疑恶性”(9例,包括2例假阳性)区分开来。只有“肯定恶性”的IV类病变才需要积极治疗,而“高度怀疑恶性”可能是由胰腺癌或炎症性胰腺病变中偶尔发现的严重细胞异常引起的,应导致再次进行胰腺穿刺。