Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Hum Reprod. 2011 Dec;26(12):3319-26. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der350. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
In many developing countries, little is known about the prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections and complications, such as infertility, thus preventing any policy from being formulated regarding screening for C. trachomatis of patients at risk for infertility. The objective of the present study was to determine the prevalence of C. trachomatis and evaluate the diagnostic utility of serological markers namely anti-C. trachomatis IgG and IgA antibodies in women attending an infertility clinic.
Serum and vaginal swab specimens of 303 women presenting with infertility to the infertility clinic of the Kigali University Teaching Hospital and 312 fertile controls who recently delivered were investigated. Two commercial species-specific ELISA were used to determine serum IgG and IgA antibodies to C. trachomatis and vaginal swabs specimens were tested by PCR. Hysterosalpingography (HSG) was performed in subfertile women.
The PCR prevalence of C. trachomatis infection was relatively low and did not differ significantly among subfertile and fertile women (3.3 versus 3.8%). Similarly, no significant differences in overall prevalence rates of C. trachomatis IgG and IgA among both groups were observed. The only factor associated with C. trachomatis infection in our study population was age <25 years. The seroprevalence of IgG in both assays (86.4% for ANILabsystems and 90.9% for Vircell) was significantly higher in the group of PCR C. trachomatis-positive women compared with that of PCR-negative women. Evidence of tubal pathology identified by HSG was found in 185 patients in the subfertile group (67.8%). All the serological markers measured in this study had very low sensitivities and negative predictive values in predicting tubal pathology. The specificities for ANILabsystems IgG, Vircell IgG, Anilabsystem IgA and positive C. trachomatis DNA to predict tubal pathology were 84, 86, 95 and 98%, respectively, whereas their respective positive predictive values were 73, 76, 81 and 80%.
The prevalence of C. trachomatis in our study population in Rwanda appears to be low and women aged <25 years are more likely to have genital infection with C. trachomatis. Since serological testing for Chlamydia shows an excellent negative predictive value for lower genital tract infection, specific peptide-based serological assays may be of use for screening in low prevalence settings. Our data suggest that C. trachomatis is not the primary pathogen responsible for tubal pathology in Rwandan women.
在许多发展中国家,人们对生殖道沙眼衣原体感染的流行情况以及不孕等并发症知之甚少,因此无法制定针对不孕高危人群的沙眼衣原体筛查政策。本研究旨在确定沙眼衣原体的流行率,并评估血清学标志物(即抗沙眼衣原体 IgG 和 IgA 抗体)在不孕诊所就诊的女性中的诊断效用。
对 303 名前往基加利大学教学医院不孕诊所就诊的不孕女性和 312 名近期分娩的健康对照者的血清和阴道拭子标本进行了调查。使用两种商业化的种特异性 ELISA 检测血清 IgG 和 IgA 抗体,并对阴道拭子标本进行 PCR 检测。对亚生育力女性进行子宫输卵管造影术(HSG)。
PCR 检测的沙眼衣原体感染率相对较低,且在亚生育力和生育力正常的女性中无显著差异(3.3%对 3.8%)。同样,两组的沙眼衣原体 IgG 和 IgA 总体阳性率也无显著差异。在我们的研究人群中,唯一与沙眼衣原体感染相关的因素是年龄<25 岁。两种检测方法(ANILabsystems 为 86.4%,Vircell 为 90.9%)的 IgG 血清阳性率在 PCR 检测的沙眼衣原体阳性女性中明显高于 PCR 检测的沙眼衣原体阴性女性。在亚生育力组的 185 名患者中发现了 HSG 确定的输卵管病理证据(67.8%)。在这项研究中测量的所有血清学标志物在预测输卵管病理方面均具有非常低的敏感性和阴性预测值。用于预测输卵管病理的 ANILabsystems IgG、Vircell IgG、Anilabsystem IgA 和阳性沙眼衣原体 DNA 的特异性分别为 84%、86%、95%和 98%,而其相应的阳性预测值分别为 73%、76%、81%和 80%。
在卢旺达,我们研究人群中的沙眼衣原体流行率似乎较低,年龄<25 岁的女性更有可能感染生殖道沙眼衣原体。由于针对衣原体的血清学检测对下生殖道感染具有极好的阴性预测值,因此基于特定肽的血清学检测可能有助于在低流行率环境下进行筛查。我们的数据表明,沙眼衣原体不是卢旺达女性输卵管病理的主要病原体。