Suppr超能文献

英国国家血液服务机构为降低输血传播细菌风险而实施的干预措施。

Interventions Implemented to Reduce the Risk of Transmission of Bacteria by Transfusion in the English National Blood Service.

作者信息

McDonald Carl P

机构信息

NHS Blood and Transplant, London, UK.

出版信息

Transfus Med Hemother. 2011;38(4):255-258. doi: 10.1159/000330474. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

Abstract

SUMMARY

BACKGROUND: Bacterial contamination remains a significant problem in transfusion medicine. A National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) study and surveillance data indicated skin commensals derived from the skin of the donor are the major contaminants of blood components. NHSBT therefore explored two interventions: improved donor arm disinfection and diversion. METHODS: IMPROVED DONOR ARM DISINFECTION: Commercial and in-house methods of disinfection were evaluated. Swabs at the venepuncture site were taken before and after disinfection and the reduction in bioburden determined. Diversion: Special collection bags were manufactured to allow the initial volume of blood to flow into a pouch, representing the diversion pouch and then the next flow of blood into another pouch representing the collection bag. Pouches were screened for the presence of bacteria. The reduction in bacterial contamination was then determined. RESULTS: A two-step commercial procedure (Donor Prep Kit; DPK) consisting of 70% isopropyl alcohol followed by tincture of iodine was shown to be a best practice procedure (2-min procedure). A 99.79% reduction was obtained, and this method was 10 times more effective than current practice at that time. The DPK was shown in a field trial to increase donor waiting time. A second study was initiated to find a more rapid procedure. ChloraPrep®, consisting of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol, was shown to have equivalent disinfection efficiency as the DPK, but only took 1 min to perform. In 2006, ChloraPrep was introduced as the national method of donor arm disinfection. Diversion was shown to give a 47% reduction in contamination and was introduced nationally in 2002. CONCLUSION: Improved donor arm disinfection and diversion are effective, low-cost interventions, but do not eliminate all bacterial transmissions. In 2011, bacterial screening of platelet components was introduced by NHSBT to further increase the safety of the blood supply.

摘要

摘要

背景:细菌污染仍是输血医学中的一个重大问题。英国国家医疗服务体系血液与移植部门(NHSBT)的一项研究及监测数据表明,源自献血者皮肤的共生菌是血液成分的主要污染物。因此,NHSBT探索了两种干预措施:改进献血者手臂消毒方法和采用血液分流措施。方法:改进献血者手臂消毒方法:对商业消毒方法和内部消毒方法进行了评估。在消毒前后采集静脉穿刺部位的拭子,并确定生物负荷的降低情况。血液分流:特制了采血袋,使最初采集的血液流入一个小袋(即分流袋),然后接下来采集的血液流入另一个代表采血袋的小袋。对小袋进行细菌检测。然后确定细菌污染的降低情况。结果:由70%异丙醇和碘酊组成的两步商业消毒程序(献血者准备套件;DPK)被证明是最佳操作流程(2分钟流程)。生物负荷降低了99.79%,该方法比当时的现行做法有效10倍。现场试验表明,DPK会增加献血者等待时间。于是启动了第二项研究以寻找更快捷的流程。由2%葡萄糖酸氯己定和70%异丙醇组成的氯己定预消毒制剂(ChloraPrep®)被证明具有与DPK相当的消毒效率,但操作只需1分钟。2006年,氯己定预消毒制剂被作为全国性的献血者手臂消毒方法采用。血液分流措施使污染降低了47%,并于2002年在全国推行。结论:改进献血者手臂消毒方法和血液分流措施是有效且低成本的干预措施,但并不能消除所有细菌传播。2011年,NHSBT引入了对血小板成分的细菌筛查,以进一步提高血液供应的安全性。

相似文献

5
Significant bacterial contamination risk reduction with the use of diversion pouch.使用引流袋可显著降低细菌污染风险。
Transfus Med. 2012 Dec;22(6):404-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2012.01194.x. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
6
A novel rapid and effective donor arm disinfection method.一种新颖的快速有效的供体臂消毒方法。
Transfusion. 2010 Jan;50(1):53-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02332.x. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
7
Evaluation of donor arm disinfection techniques.供体手臂消毒技术的评估。
Vox Sang. 2001 Apr;80(3):135-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2001.00029.x.
10
Evaluation of donor skin disinfection methods.供体皮肤消毒方法的评估。
Transfusion. 1997 Mar;37(3):309-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37397240214.x.

引用本文的文献

7
Impact of Bacterial Contamination on Blood Supply.细菌污染对血液供应的影响。
Transfus Med Hemother. 2011;38(4):229-230. doi: 10.1159/000330431.

本文引用的文献

3
A novel rapid and effective donor arm disinfection method.一种新颖的快速有效的供体臂消毒方法。
Transfusion. 2010 Jan;50(1):53-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02332.x. Epub 2009 Aug 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验