Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, Republic of China.
Br J Nutr. 2011 Dec;106(11):1649-54. doi: 10.1017/S000711451100540X. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
Epidemiological studies of dietary glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) in relation to diabetes risk have yielded inconsistent results. We aimed to examine the associations between dietary GI and GL and the risk of type 2 diabetes by conducting a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Relevant studies were identified by a PubMed database search up to February 2011. Reference lists from retrieved articles were also reviewed. We included prospective cohort studies that reported risk estimates with 95 % CI for the associations between dietary GI and GL and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Either a fixed- or random-effects model was used to compute the summary relative risk (RR). We identified thirteen prospective cohort studies of dietary GI or GL related to diabetes risk. The summary RR of type 2 diabetes for the highest category of the GI compared with the lowest was 1·16 (95 % CI 1·06, 1·26; n 12), with moderate evidence of heterogeneity (P = 0·02, I(2) = 50·8 %). For the GL, the summary RR was 1·20 (95 % CI 1·11, 1·30; n 12), with little evidence of heterogeneity (P = 0·10, I(2) = 34·8 %). No evidence of publication bias was observed. In addition, the associations persisted and remained statistically significant in the sensitivity analyses. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis provides further evidence in support of significantly positive associations between dietary GI and GL and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Reducing the intake of high-GI foods may bring benefits in diabetes prevention.
关于饮食血糖指数(GI)和血糖负荷(GL)与糖尿病风险的关系的流行病学研究结果并不一致。我们旨在通过对前瞻性队列研究进行荟萃分析,研究饮食 GI 和 GL 与 2 型糖尿病风险之间的关系。通过对截至 2011 年 2 月的 PubMed 数据库进行检索,确定了相关研究。还对检索到的文章的参考文献进行了回顾。我们纳入了报告饮食 GI 和 GL 与 2 型糖尿病风险之间关联的风险估计值和 95%CI 的前瞻性队列研究。使用固定或随机效应模型计算汇总相对风险(RR)。我们确定了 13 项关于饮食 GI 或 GL 与糖尿病风险相关的前瞻性队列研究。与最低 GI 相比,最高 GI 组 2 型糖尿病的汇总 RR 为 1.16(95%CI 1.06,1.26;n=12),异质性有中等程度证据(P=0.02,I(2)=50.8%)。对于 GL,汇总 RR 为 1.20(95%CI 1.11,1.30;n=12),异质性证据较少(P=0.10,I(2)=34.8%)。未观察到发表偏倚的证据。此外,敏感性分析表明,这些关联仍然存在且具有统计学意义。总之,本荟萃分析提供了进一步的证据,支持饮食 GI 和 GL 与 2 型糖尿病风险之间存在显著的正相关关系。减少高 GI 食物的摄入可能会带来预防糖尿病的益处。