Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Hospital, Seoul.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Mar;91(3):187-92. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318238a0e3.
The aim of this study was to determine whether the risk and severity of penetration-aspiration with mixed consistency (MIX), which consists of cooked rice and thin liquid barium (LIQUID), are different from the risks and severities with each single consistency (cooked rice or LIQUID) in dysphagic patients.
Dysphagic patients (N = 29) performed a videofluoroscopic swallowing study with the following foods: cooked rice, LIQUID, and MIX. Several components were analyzed using recorded videotapes.
The Penetration-Aspiration Scale score for MIX was significantly lower than that for LIQUID (P < 0.016). The location of the leading edge at the onset of a pharyngeal swallow between MIX and LIQUID was not different (P = 0.705). The pharyngeal delay time of LIQUID was delayed significantly compared with that of MIX (0.142 ± 0.267 and -0.149 ± 0.096 sec, respectively, P < 0.016). The severity of pharyngeal residue among the foods was different according to the location.
Swallowing of MIX is not dangerous, and it is safer for not inducing penetration-aspiration as compared with the swallowing of LIQUID. The risk of penetration-aspiration may be judged depending on not only a food's consistency but also on various factors that affect airway protection, including the texture of food.
本研究旨在确定在吞咽困难患者中,混合稠度(由煮熟的米饭和稀薄的钡液组成,即 MIX)与单一稠度(煮熟的米饭或钡液)相比,渗透-吸入的风险和严重程度是否存在差异。
吞咽困难患者(N=29)进行了视频透视吞咽研究,使用以下食物:煮熟的米饭、钡液和 MIX。使用记录的录像带分析了几个成分。
MIX 的渗透-吸入量表评分明显低于 LIQUID(P<0.016)。MIX 和 LIQUID 在咽吞咽开始时的前缘位置没有差异(P=0.705)。LIQUID 的咽延迟时间明显长于 MIX(分别为 0.142±0.267 和-0.149±0.096 秒,P<0.016)。根据位置的不同,食物中的咽部残留严重程度也不同。
与吞咽 LIQUID 相比,MIX 吞咽并不危险,并且不太可能引起渗透-吸入。渗透-吸入的风险不仅取决于食物的稠度,还取决于影响气道保护的各种因素,包括食物的质地。