Medical Department, Univé Insurance and Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25 Suppl):S238-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182388400.
A descriptive overview of the relevant literature and the introduction of a new psychological model.
The fear-avoidance (FA) model and the potential importance of illness beliefs in post-traumatic neck pain are discussed. The causal beliefs-anxiety model is introduced as an adaptation of the FA model, emphasizing the critical role of illness beliefs.
Although the FA model is most thoroughly used to investigate chronic low back pain, it seems also highly relevant as a starting point for other chronic pain conditions like whiplash. Kinesophobia and pain catastrophizing form critical components of the FA model. It has been shown that breaking the FA cycle by affecting the critical components of the model may be an effective method to prevent the development of chronicity.
By using the FA model as a starting point, we present the causal beliefs-anxiety model and argue how this might help explain chronic whiplash symptoms and might provide clues for preventive interventions.
On experiencing muscular neck pain, catastrophizing may give rise to dysfunctional illness beliefs regarding the cause of this pain. The illness identity and other beliefs feed symptom expectation and attribution, as well as expectations regarding the course of muscular neck pain. These negative expectations can contribute to a less favorable outcome or may even cause symptoms. Therefore, it seems important to integrate the alleged role of illness beliefs in an adapted FA model, the "causal beliefs-anxiety model."
In clinical practice, it seems important to have insight into the patient's illness beliefs about the cause of the experienced symptoms. Health care professionals should be aware of the possible detrimental influence of dysfunctional illness beliefs. In the early stage, adequate explanation and information about the probable course may be sufficient to prevent the generation of dysfunctional illness beliefs thereby preventing the development of a chronic course. At the population level, educational campaigns that inform people about probable causes and realistic expectations regarding post-traumatic neck pain could provide an effective strategy for preventing chronic whiplash symptoms.
对相关文献的描述性概述,并引入新的心理模型。
讨论恐惧回避(FA)模型以及疾病信念在后创伤性颈痛中的潜在重要性。引入因果信念-焦虑模型作为 FA 模型的改编,强调疾病信念的关键作用。
尽管 FA 模型最常用于研究慢性下腰痛,但它似乎也非常适用于其他慢性疼痛疾病,如挥鞭伤。运动恐惧症和疼痛灾难化是 FA 模型的关键组成部分。已经表明,通过影响模型的关键组成部分来打破 FA 循环可能是预防慢性发生的有效方法。
以 FA 模型为起点,我们提出了因果信念-焦虑模型,并论证了这如何帮助解释慢性挥鞭伤症状,并为预防干预提供线索。
在经历肌肉性颈痛时,灾难化可能会导致对这种疼痛原因的功能性疾病信念。疾病身份和其他信念会影响症状预期和归因,以及对肌肉性颈痛病程的预期。这些负面预期可能导致预后不佳,甚至导致症状出现。因此,在 FA 模型中纳入疾病信念的作用,即“因果信念-焦虑模型”,似乎很重要。
在临床实践中,了解患者对所经历症状的病因的疾病信念似乎很重要。医疗保健专业人员应该意识到功能失调的疾病信念可能产生的有害影响。在早期阶段,充分解释和提供有关可能病程的信息可能足以防止产生功能失调的疾病信念,从而预防慢性病程的发展。在人群层面上,开展有关后创伤性颈痛的可能病因和现实预期的教育活动可能是预防慢性挥鞭伤症状的有效策略。