Myrtveit Solbjørg Makalani, Carstensen Tina, Kasch Helge, Ørnbøl Eva, Frostholm Lisbeth
Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.
The Research Clinic for Functional Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 20;5(3):e007239. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007239.
Individuals exposed to whiplash collisions have to cope with the stressful event as well as early physical symptoms. As in other chronic pain conditions, coping has been associated with outcome after whiplash. In this study, our aim was to examine whether initial coping preferences were associated with the development of chronic whiplash.
Prospective study.
Primary care.
740 acute whiplash patients were recruited from emergency units and general practitioners after car collisions in Denmark. Within 10 days postinjury, participants were asked what they believed could help them get better. At 12-month follow-up, the level of neck pain and capability to work was obtained. Whether coping preferences (baseline) were associated with outcome was investigated using multiple regression analyses.
Persistent neck pain was most strongly associated with preferring medications (mean difference=1.24 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.82)) and sickness absence (mean difference=1.18 (95% CI 0.53 to 1.82)). Reduced work capability was most strongly associated with preferring medications (OR=3.53 (95% CI 2.13 to 5.86)), sickness absence (OR=3.05 (95% CI 1.80 to 5.17)) and being referred to a physiotherapist/chiropractor (OR=3.03 (95% CI 1.33 to 6.91)). Active coping was associated with better outcomes: Participants preferring to change their lifestyle were protected against reduced work capability (OR=0.11 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.78)). Individuals who wanted to keep living as usual only (no other preference reported) were protected against neck pain (mean difference -1.62 (95% CI -2.39 to -0.84)) and reduced work capability (OR=0.09 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.64)).
A simple nine-item measure of coping preferences is associated with the development of chronic neck pain and reduced capability to work following whiplash trauma and may be used to identify individuals at risk of poor recovery.
遭受挥鞭样碰撞的个体必须应对这一应激事件以及早期身体症状。与其他慢性疼痛情况一样,应对方式与挥鞭样损伤后的结果相关。在本研究中,我们的目的是检验初始应对偏好是否与慢性挥鞭样损伤的发生有关。
前瞻性研究。
初级保健机构。
从丹麦因汽车碰撞而就诊于急诊科和全科医生处的患者中招募了740例急性挥鞭样损伤患者。在受伤后10天内,询问参与者他们认为什么能帮助他们好转。在12个月随访时,获取颈部疼痛程度和工作能力。使用多元回归分析研究应对偏好(基线)是否与结果相关。
持续性颈部疼痛与偏好使用药物(平均差异=1.24(95%可信区间0.67至1.82))和病休(平均差异=1.18(95%可信区间0.53至1.82))的关联最为密切。工作能力下降与偏好使用药物(比值比=3.53(95%可信区间2.13至5.86))、病休(比值比=3.05(95%可信区间1.80至5.17))以及被转诊至物理治疗师/整脊师处(比值比=3.03(95%可信区间1.33至6.91))的关联最为密切。积极应对与更好的结果相关:偏好改变生活方式的参与者可预防工作能力下降(比值比=0.11(95%可信区间0.01至0.78))。只想维持正常生活(未报告其他偏好)的个体可预防颈部疼痛(平均差异-1.62(95%可信区间-2.39至-0.84))和工作能力下降(比值比=0.09(95%可信区间0.01至0.64))。
一种简单的包含九个条目的应对偏好测量方法与挥鞭样创伤后慢性颈部疼痛的发生以及工作能力下降相关,可用于识别恢复不佳风险较高的个体。