Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Cancer. 2012 Jun 1;118(11):2889-99. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26584. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
Lung adenocarcinoma is histologically heterogeneous and has 5 distinct histologic growth patterns: lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, and solid. To date, there is no consensus regarding the clinical utility of these patterns.
The authors performed a detailed semiquantitative assessment of histologic patterns of 240 lung adenocarcinomas and determined the association with patients' clinicopathologic features, including recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. In a subset of tumors, expression levels of 2 prognostic molecular markers were evaluated: thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) (n = 218) and a panel of 5 proteins (referred as the FILM signature index) (n = 185).
Four mutually exclusive tumor histology pattern groups were identified: 1) any solid (38%), 2) any papillary but no solid (14%), 3) lepidic and acinar but no solid or papillary (30%), and 4) acinar only (18%). Patients in group 3 had a higher RFS rate than patients in group 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4510; P = .0165) and group 2 (HR, 0.4253; P = .0425). Solid pattern tumors (group 1) were associated with a lower OS rate than nonsolid pattern tumors (all stages: HR; 1.665; P = .0144; stages I and II: HR, 2.157; P = .008). In the patients who had tumors with a nonsolid pattern, high TTF-1 expression was associated significantly with higher RFS (HR, 0.994; P = .0017) and OS (HR, 0.996; P = .0276) rates in all stages, and a high FILM signature index score was associated with lower RFS and OS rates in all stages (RFS: HR, 1.343; P = .0192; OS: HR, 1.371; P = .0156) and in stages I and II (RFS: HR, 1.419; P = .0095; OS: HR, 1.315; P = .0422).
The presence of a solid histologic pattern was identified as a marker of unfavorable prognosis in patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma. High TTF-1 expression and low FILM signature index scores were associated with a better prognosis for patients who had tumors with a nonsolid pattern.
肺腺癌在组织学上具有异质性,有 5 种不同的组织生长模式:贴壁型、腺泡型、乳头型、微乳头型和实体型。迄今为止,这些模式的临床应用价值尚无共识。
作者对 240 例肺腺癌进行了详细的半定量组织学模式评估,并确定了这些模式与患者临床病理特征之间的关系,包括无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率(OS)。在肿瘤的亚组中,评估了 2 个预后分子标志物的表达水平:甲状腺转录因子-1(TTF-1)(n=218)和 5 种蛋白的表达(称为 FILM 标志物指数)(n=185)。
确定了 4 个互斥的肿瘤组织学模式组:1)任何实体型(38%),2)任何乳头型但无实体型(14%),3)贴壁型和腺泡型但无实体型或乳头型(30%),和 4)腺泡型(18%)。组 3 的患者 RFS 率高于组 1(危险比[HR],0.4510;P=.0165)和组 2(HR,0.4253;P=.0425)。实体型肿瘤(组 1)的 OS 率低于非实体型肿瘤(所有分期:HR,1.665;P=.0144;I 期和 II 期:HR,2.157;P=.008)。在具有非实体型肿瘤的患者中,高 TTF-1 表达与所有分期的较高 RFS(HR,0.994;P=.0017)和 OS(HR,0.996;P=.0276)显著相关,高 FILM 标志物指数评分与所有分期的较低 RFS 和 OS 率相关(RFS:HR,1.343;P=.0192;OS:HR,1.371;P=.0156)和 I 期和 II 期(RFS:HR,1.419;P=.0095;OS:HR,1.315;P=.0422)。
在原发性肺腺癌患者中,存在实体组织学模式被确定为预后不良的标志物。对于具有非实体型肿瘤的患者,高 TTF-1 表达和低 FILM 标志物指数评分与更好的预后相关。